While working on my own type erasure iterator, I ran into an issue where the compiler (MSVC10) crashed with a stack overflow on this code:
struct base {}; //In actual code, this is a template struct that holds data
template<class category, class valuetype>
struct any; //In actual code, this is abstract base struct
template<class basetype, class category, class valuetype>
struct from; //In actual code, this is function definitions of any
template<class valuetype>
struct any<void,valuetype>
{ void a() {} };
template<class category, class valuetype>
struct any
: public any<void,valuetype> //commenting this line makes it compile
{ void b() {} };
template<class basetype, class valuetype>
struct from<basetype,void,valuetype>
: public base //commenting out _either_ of these makes it compile
, public any<void,valuetype>
{ void c() {} };
int main() {
from<int, void, char> a;
a.a();
a.c();
any<int, char> b;
b.a();
b.b();
return 0;
}
Obviously, I've removed everything I can where the bug remains. (Origional code was 780+ lines) Removing any remaining template parameters causes the code to compile.
The full error message is:
main.cpp(23): fatal error C1063: compiler limit : compiler stack overflow
main.cpp(20) : see reference to class template instantiation 'from<basetype,void,valuetype>' being compiled
IDEOne compiles it fine. I've heard that MSVC implemented two-phase lookup wrong, which seems relevant, but doesn't explain why it compiles when I remove the line that makes from
inherit from base
. Can anyone teach me why MSVC10 won't compile this? What did I do that I should be avoiding?
As a workaround, consider introducing an additional class between the unspecialized any
and the specialization with category = void
:
template <class valuetype>
class detail_void_any
: public any<void, valuetype>
{
};
template<class category, class valuetype>
class any
: public detail_void_any<valuetype>
{
};
The following complete program should compile without error:
class base {}; // Data Holder (in reality it's templated, so required)
template<class category, class valuetype>
class any; // Virtual Function Interface
template<class basetype, class category, class valuetype>
class from; // Virtual Function Implementation
template<class valuetype>
class any<void,valuetype>
{};
template <class valuetype>
class detail_void_any
: public any<void, valuetype>
{
};
template<class category, class valuetype>
class any
: public detail_void_any<valuetype>
{
};
template<class basetype, class valuetype>
class from<basetype,void,valuetype>
: public base //commenting out _either_ of these makes it compile
, public any<void,valuetype>
{}; //this is line 23, where the compiler crashes
int main() {return 0;}
Well I give up but I did manage to generate a warning:
template <typename T1, typename T2>
class Any; // forward
template <typename T2>
class Any<void, T2> // partial spec of forward
{};
template <typename T1, typename T2>
class Any: // template definition
public Any<void, T2> // inherit from partial spec
{};
template <typename T1, typename T2>
class From :
public Any<int, T2>, // inherit definition
public Any<void, T2> // inherit definition or partial spec?
// with spec first we get fatal error C1063: compiler limit : compiler stack overflow (CRASH!)
// with definition first we get warning C4584: 'From<T1,T2>' : base-class 'Any<void,T2>' is already a base-class of 'Any<int,T2>'
{};
int main()
{
return 0;
}
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With