CI: Hudson with .Net vs CruiseControl.Net [closed]

Question

I work for a .net shop looking to integrate a CI server. From what I've seen, Hudson seems to be the most popular choice. Considering we are a .net only shop, will Hudson present any hurdles that CC.NET will not?

Answer 1

I cant think of a single thing that Hudson hasnt been able to do for our C# development, even with MSTest based tests, you can now run and trendgraph on them with the new plugin (only works if you are testing ONE assembly) or my method which works on multiple assemblies.

I suppose the only thing that would be nice, would be to generate code coverage data and report on that, not sure if CC.net does that.

Also, Hudson seems to have much stronger community support. I've never heard of someone picking CC.net over Hudson if they had the choice.

We use it to

• Deploy windows services
• Deploy web services
• Run MSTests & display as much information as any junit tests
• Keep track of low,med,high tasks
• trendgraph warnings and errors

These things may not be anything new to Hudson, but I felt the need to re emphasize that Hudson can handle this with a .net project, no problem.

Here are some of the built in .net stuff that Hudson supports

• MSBuild
• NAnt
• MSTest (two methods, linked above)
• Nunit
• Team Foundation Server
• fxcop
• stylecop
• compiler warnings
• code tasks

Also, god forbid you are using visual source safe, it supports that as well. I'd recommend you take a look at Redsolo's article on building .net projects using Hudson

Answer 2

Hudson is much easier for beginners. We use it to auto-build and pack C++ Builder dlls and exes. Think about that! It's not Java nor C#.