Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

Choosing a video codec for screen recording

I'm doing a series of tutorials by recording the screen and my voice. Just as PNG works best for screenshots, while JPEG is better suited for photographs (although lossy), which video encoding & container formats are better for screen recording?

Please provide suggestions for both:

  1. The Master copy (for editing & archiving. (Almost) Lossless)
  2. Distribution copies (high compression with acceptable loss)

Points to consider:

  • High quality video with on-screen text being legible
  • Good compression. I guess both inter-frame & intra-frame compression will be effective.
  • Please mention recommended values of configurable parameters like frame rate, compression level, etc.
  • Closed captions to be supported (not "hard-coded" onto the video). I'm inclining towards .srt format
  • Viewable on Windows, Linux & MacOS
like image 277
Dheeraj Vepakomma Avatar asked Jan 20 '12 07:01

Dheeraj Vepakomma


People also ask

Which codec is best for screen recording?

MPEG-1 is the most widely compatible, lossy audio/video format in the world. Most media players, including YouTube, support the MPEG-1 codec. The MPEG-1 codec offers a good quality of video and uses much less CPU than other codecs (The quality of MPEG-1 is similar to Xvid.)

How do I choose a video codec?

Generally speaking, you should aim for the highest-quality codec that your camera (or your budget) can capture. When I say “highest quality”, I mean that you want to capture as much information as possible. So you want less-lossy codecs: less compression, higher bit-depth, and less chroma subsampling.

What type of video encoding is best?

AVCHD. Developed by Panasonic and Sony for digital camcorders, AVCHD is the best quality video format for those shooting high-end videos. Out of the popular choices listed here, this is the highest quality video format.


2 Answers

Master copy
Lossless - HUFFYUV in AVI is a good option.
Lossy - MJPEG (series of JPEG) in AVI is a good option, where each frame will be independently encoded. The editing will be faster.

Distribution
Video codec - Use either H.264 video (not free) or VP8 (free video codec by Google). You should use codec with inter frame compression as screen recording tends to have a lot of similarity across frames, hence allowing for a better compression. Both VP8 and H.264 support inter compression where as MJPEG does not.

File format - Depending on video codec, you can use either MP4 or MKV file format. H.264 is more often encapsulated in MP4 container and VP8 in MKV. Google WebM format is subset of MKV format.

Subtitles - SRT is good choice for external subtitles. MKV supports internal subtitles if you want to embed subtitles inside MKV file as a separate stream.

Frame rate - 24 fps is good enough frame rate for your use case. You can actually use even lower frame rates if needed.

Bitrate/Compression level - Depends on resolution of the video. You should be able find good tutorials which provide which bitrate is best for given resolution.

Support - MKV with VP8 will play on Windows (Windows Media player) and Linux provided necessary software is installed. VLC Player is available on both Windows and Linux and plays MKV with VP8 without any issues.

like image 51
Oak Bytes Avatar answered Sep 29 '22 15:09

Oak Bytes


One important thing to consider when capturing a mostly static screen (desktop recording) is to use the VBR (Variable Bit Rate) option over CBR (Constant Bit Rate), in my case it reduced video size nearly 10 times without losing quality (the video stream average bitrate became comparable to the audio stream =-D).

H.264 has such option, but you have to set it manually, as usually default is CBR (at least in OBS Studio). If you use command line, ffmpeg has CRF (Constant Quality) by default, which also works pretty well for non-camera recorded videos.

like image 32
Klesun Avatar answered Sep 29 '22 15:09

Klesun