In phpunit we can specify the method was called with particular
->with($this->equalTo('foobar'))
or any
->with($this->anything())
parameter.
But is there a way to specify that the method has been called without parameters at all?
This is the test I expect to fail:
public function testZ()
{
$a = $this->getMock('q');
$a->expects($this->once())
->method('z')
->with(); // <--- what constraint to specify here?
$a->z(1);
}
UPD:
The question has theoretical nature, so I have no any real life example. Some case it could be useful I can think of right now is:
public function testMe($object)
{
$object->foo();
}
And let's assume that testMe
should (by design and by requirements) always call the method without parameters (assuming foo()
has default ones). Because any non-default parameter (more precise: any parameter != to default one, which we don't know yet and which probably could change independently) in this case causes fatal consequences.
While rdlowrey is correct that with()
doesn't make provisions for checking for no arguments passed, the problem doesn't lie with PHPUnit but PHP itself.
First, if your method doesn't provide default values, the interpreter will raise a fatal error if you don't pass any parameters. This is expected and not entirely relevant to the question at hand, but it's important to state up front.
Second, if your method does provide default values, calling the method without arguments will cause PHP to alter the call before PHPUnit gets involved to pass the defaults instead. Here's a simple test that demonstrates PHP inserting itself before PHP can check the parameters. It's key to realize that the mock class that PHP creates has the same signature as the mocked class--including the defaults.
class MockTest extends PHPUnit_Framework_TestCase {
public function test() {
$mock = $this->getMock('Foo', array('bar'));
$mock->expects($this->once())
->method('bar')
->with() // does nothing, but it doesn't matter
->will($this->returnArgument(0));
self::assertEquals('foobar', $mock->bar()); // PHP inserts 1 and 2
// assertion fails because 1 != 'foobar'
}
}
class Foo {
public function bar($x = 1, $y = 2) {
return $x + $y;
}
}
This means you can verify that either nothing was passed or the default values were passed, but you cannot be more specific.
Can you get around this limitation? You can remove default values from arguments when overriding methods, so you should be able to create a subclass and mock it. Is it worth it? My initial gut reaction is that this is a huge code smell. Either your design or your tests are doing the Wrong Thing(tm).
If you can provide a real-world, concrete example where you actually need to do this kind of test, it's worth spending some time pondering a solution. Until then, I'm satisfied with the purely academic answer of "don't do that." :)
PHPUnit mock objects can only use the ->with()
constraint method to verify that the count or respective values of passed parameters match those passed to the mocked method when invoked. You can't use it to require that no arguments are passed to the mock method.
The mock verification process specifically checks that the passed parameter count and the associated values are compatible with those passed to the with
constraint. Also, as you've probably seen, specifying the with
constraint without any values won't work either; if with
receives no parameters it won't add any parameter constraints for verification.
You can see the actual PHPUnit_Framework_MockObject_Matcher_Parameters::verify
method used to verify mock method parameters in the linked github source.
If validation of no passed arguments is a requirement you'll need to specify your own mock class to verify such a condition outside the PHPUnit mocking capabilities.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With