I have read a bit about casting in C++. Coming from a C background, using normal (type) casting is common for things like void * but for C++, there are dynamic_cast, reinterpret_cast, static_cast, etc.
The problem/issue/question is about which of the above casts should be used when a conversion between a base pointer and a derived pointer.
Our data storage stores a pointer to a base class (B). The functions allocate the derived pointers (D).
The code example is as follows:
class B
{ int _some_data; }
class D : public B
{ int _some_more_data; }
The code then looks something like:
D *obj = new D;
obj->_some_data = 1;
obj->_some_more_data = 2;
<store obj>
Then later when we access the data:
B *objB = <get out data>
if (objB->_some_data == 1)
{ D *objD = (D *) objB; <do some processing> }
Now the cast I am concerned about is D *objD = (D *) objB.
Which cast should we be using?
Thanks.
In this case, no cast is truly safe.
The safest would be dynamic_cast, but your objects aren't polymorphic so it doesn't apply here. But you should consider at least having a virtual destructor, as I can see you plan on extending the classes.
static_cast is not safe, as pointed out by this msdn page:
class B {};
class D : public B {};
void f(B* pb, D* pd) {
   D* pd2 = static_cast<D*>(pb);   // not safe, pb may
                                   // point to just B
   B* pb2 = static_cast<B*>(pd);   // safe conversion
}
reinterpret_cast also has no checks, so don't rely on it.
Also, casting to a pointer of a derived class is at least a code smell, if you need to do this it's 99% sure you have a flawed design.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With