I'm looking at the API and the :+ method returns a new LinkedList. The append method will only allow the appending of another linked list. The += method needs a var to work. Why would anyone ever need these if the LinkedList is mutable? What craziness is this?
If I had something like this in Java
final LinkedList myList = new LinkedList<String>();
mylist.add("balh");
How do I achieve the same thing in Scala?
If append
can only take a LinkedList
then why not use
mylist append LinkedList("something")
or
mylist append LinkedList(otherContainer: _*)
There is a reason for allowing only other LinkedList
s in append
, I think, because this guarantees the following:
l1 = LinkedList(1, 2, 3)
l2 = LinkedList(4)
l3 = LinkedList(5)
l1 append l2
// l1 == LinkedList(1, 2, 3, 4)
// l2 == LinkedList(4)
l2 append l3
// l1 == LinkedList(1, 2, 3, 4, 5)
// l2 == LinkedList(4, 5)
// l3 == LinkedList(5)
You can use a Buffer
to build your values and convert it in the data structure using mapResult
.
//Create a buffer which will build a linked list
val buf = new ArrayBuffer[String] mapResult { xs => LinkedList( xs:_* ) }
//You can append elements with +=, it is overriden to allow its use on a val
buf += "Something"
buf += "else"
//At the end you get your list
val lst = buf.result
// lst == LinkedList(Something, else)
Mutability is on the actual elements within the list and not on the structure that the list has (persistence). This is also stated in the scaladoc.
If returning a new List each time is not what you are after, and you cannot use var, you could always use the Java LinkedList
.
val mylist = new java.util.LinkedList[String]
mylist add "something"
I'd stick with the Scala lists, if at all possible.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With