I'm using objects to namespace my JavaScript code. These objects usually contain functions that are called mapping the this
-pointer to the object itself using apply
. However, I find it inconvenient to use the this
-pointer everytime I want to access other functions or properties of the object, especially because in lots of cases I use the new
-operator to use function-objects the way you would use classes. I would prefer writing new Line()
instead if new this.Line()
.
It would be great if you could add local variables to a function the way php does it with extract
(pseudocode following, it's a little more complicated)
var sample_object = {
"some_function": function() {}
}
test() {
extract(sample_object);
some_function(); // imported from sample_object
}
Is that even possible?
In a high-level language, non-static local variables declared in a function are stack dynamic local variables by default. Some C++ texts refer to such variables as automatics. This means that the local variables are created by allocating space on the stack and assigning these stack locations to the variables.
A stack-dynamic variable is one that is bound to an address on the stack, which is dynamically (during run-time) allocated for that purpose. It may also be unbound during run-time, and its memory cell deallocated by being popped off the stack.
Variables that are declared inside a function or block are called local variables. They can be used only by statements that are inside that function or block of code. Local variables are not known to functions outside their own. The following example shows how local variables are used.
I'm pretty sure eval
is your only answer; but you need to be aware that if there's any input outside of your control involved, it isn't safe
function dynamicArgs (varName, varValue) {
eval("var " + varName + "=" + JSON.encode(varValue) );
alert(a);
}
dynamicArgs("a", "value");
You can see the problem with this. How is your function supposed to call the dynamic variable if it doesn't know its name? I hardcoded it to the a variable since I pass it in when calling it, but that's not a good solution. The only solution would be another eval
. You really should think about what you need to do and whether this is useful. But it's doable.
Here it is in action: http://jsfiddle.net/mendesjuan/GG3Wu/
function dynamicArgs (varName, varValue) {
eval('var ' + varName + "='" + varValue + "';");
alert(eval(varName));
}
dynamicArgs("f", "Here I am");
Now here's an example like what you're doing, creating a variable from this.MyConstructor
http://jsfiddle.net/mendesjuan/AK3WD/
var ns = {
MyConstructor: function(val) {
this.prop = val;
},
runConstructor: function(val) {
var Ctor = "MyConstructor";
eval('var ' + Ctor + ' = this.' + Ctor);
return new MyConstructor(val);
}
}
alert( ns.runConstructor("Hello").prop );
And here's an example if you wanted to import all the values from an object into the scope;
http://jsfiddle.net/mendesjuan/AK3WD/1/
var ns = {
MyConstructor: function(val) {
this.val= val;
},
anotherProperty: 5,
runConstructor: function(val) {
// Bring all the variables from this into this scope
for (var prop in this) {
eval('var ' + prop + ' = this.' + prop);
}
alert('Testing var anotherProperty: ' + anotherProperty);
var obj = new MyConstructor(val);
alert('Created MyConstructor: its prop is ' + obj.val)
}
}
ns.runConstructor("Hello");
There is controversial with
, which has some great applications, but is marginally slow and prone to errors. It throws an error in the strict mode (which you should always opt into) and is going to be deprecated.
var sampleObject = {
someFunction: function() {},
b: 10
}
with (sampleObject) {
typeof someFunction // "function"
var a = 42
var b = 20
}
sampleObject.a // undefined
sampleObject.b // 20
Note, that new variables defined in a with
-block won't be added to the object. Nevertheless, if the object already had an eponymous property in it, this property would be modified (thanks, @Rocket).
Just for fun, here's an implementation of extract
using eval
(which is even more evil than with
). You can do unspeakable things with it, for example if your object has properties like sampleObject['x; while (true) { alert("Hi!") }']
.
This is how I did it:
function smObject ( object) {
return function () {
function getter(prop) {
return function() {
return this[prop];
}
}
function setter(prop) {
return function(data) {
this[prop]=data;
}
}
for (var o = 0; o < object.length; o++) {
this[object[o]] = {};
this['get' + object[o]] = getter(object[o]);
this['set' + object[o]] = setter(object[o]);
}
}
}
now you can instantiate a function like this:
var fields = ['Name', 'Id', 'Other', '....' ]
var MyFunction = smObject( fields );
var myObject = new MyFunction();
// getter/setters
myObject.setId(5);
myObject.getId(); // will return 5
Regards, Emanouil
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With