Virtual Constructor in C++ In C++, the constructor cannot be virtual, because when a constructor of a class is executed there is no virtual table in the memory, means no virtual pointer defined yet. So, the constructor should always be non-virtual. But virtual destructor is possible.
Copy Constructor in C++ClassName (const ClassName &old_obj); Copy constructor is used to initialize the members of a newly created object by copying the members of an already existing object. Copy constructor takes a reference to an object of the same class as an argument.
Because, now we have explicitly provided a matching 'copy' constructor. So, saying 'Inheriting copy constructors are now allowed' is invalid.
Hence, there is always one copy constructor that is either defined by the user or by the system.
No you can't, constructors can't be virtual.
C++03 - 12.1 Constructors
4) A constructor shall not be
virtual
(10.3) orstatic
(9.4). [...]
If you need something like this, you can look up the virtual constructor idiom here.
No you cannot.
Furthermore, the whole concept does not make sense. Virtual functions are functions that are dispatched based on the value of an object (the dynamic type of the object). When a constructor is called, the object does not yet have a value (because it has not yet been constructed). Therefore, no virtual dispatch can possibly occur.
Think about it. What semantics would such a constructor have?
No. C++ being static typed language, it is meaningless to the C++ compiler to create an object polymorphically. The compiler must be aware of the class type to create the object. In other words, what type of object to be created is a compile time decision from C++ compiler perspective. If we make constructor virtual, compiler flags an error.
You cannot because the memory is allocated before the constructor is called based on the size of the new type not the copy operand. And if it did work it would be a special case that inverted polymorphism for a number of language constructs.
But that doesn't mean it can't be done with a little C++ magic. :)
There are couple cases where it is incredibly helpful, Serializing non-POD classes for instance. This example creates a virtual copy constructor that works using placement new.
Warning: This is an example that may help some users with specific problems. Do not do this in general purpose code. It will crash if the memory allocated for the new class is smaller than the derived class. The best (and only) safe way to use this is if you are managing your own class memory and using placement new.
class VirtualBase
{
public:
VirtualBase() {}
virtual ~VirtualBase() {}
VirtualBase(const VirtualBase& copy)
{
copy.VirtualPlacementCopyConstructor(this);
}
virtual void VirtualPlacementCopyConstructor(void*) const {}
};
class Derived :: public VirtualBase
{
public:
...
Derived(const Derived& copy) : ... don't call baseclass and make an infinite loop
{
}
protected:
void VirtualPlacementCopyConstructor(void* place) const
{
new (place) Derived(*this);
}
};
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With