Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

Can the "using" declaration be used with templates?

Is it possible to use the "using" declaration with template base classes? I have read it isn't here but is that because of a technical reason or is it against the C++ standard, and does it apply to gcc or other compilers? If it is not possible, why not?

Example code (from the link above):

struct A {
    template<class T> void f(T);
};

struct B : A {
    using A::f<int>;
};
like image 987
Sydius Avatar asked Dec 06 '08 20:12

Sydius


People also ask

How do you declare a template?

To instantiate a template class explicitly, follow the template keyword by a declaration (not definition) for the class, with the class identifier followed by the template arguments. template class Array<char>; template class String<19>; When you explicitly instantiate a class, all of its members are also instantiated.

What is the use of using declaration?

Using-declaration introduces a member of a base class into the derived class definition, such as to expose a protected member of base as public member of derived. In this case, nested-name-specifier must name a base class of the one being defined.

What is the use of using declaration in C++?

A using declaration in a definition of a class A allows you to introduce a name of a data member or member function from a base class of A into the scope of A .

What is the difference between using declaration and using directive?

The obvious reason is that a using declaration and a using directive have different effects. A using declaration introduces the name immediately into the current scope, so using std::swap introduces the name into the local scope; lookup stops here, and the only symbol you find is std::swap .


1 Answers

What you linked to is a using directive. A using declaration can be used fine with templated base classes (haven't looked it up in the standard, but just tested it with a compiler):

template<typename T> struct c1 { 
    void foo() { std::cout << "empty" << std::endl; } 
}; 

template<typename T> struct c2 : c1<T> { 
    using c1<T>::foo; 
    void foo(int) { std::cout << "int" << std::endl; } 
}; 

int main() { 
    c2<void> c;
    c.foo();
    c.foo(10); 
}

The compiler correctly finds the parameter-less foo function because of our using-declaration re-declaring it into the scope of c2, and outputs the expected result.

Edit: updated the question. here is the updated answer:

The article is right about that you are not allowed to use a template-id (template name and arguments). But you can put a template name:

struct c1 { 
    template<int> void foo() { std::cout << "empty" << std::endl; } 
}; 

struct c2 : c1 { 
    using c1::foo; // using c1::foo<10> is not valid
    void foo(int) { std::cout << "int" << std::endl; } 
}; 

int main() { 
    c2 c;
    c.foo<10>();
    c.foo(10); 
}
like image 192
Johannes Schaub - litb Avatar answered Oct 17 '22 03:10

Johannes Schaub - litb