I'm trying to build the Elm Platform using a cabal sandbox. The installation fails however with the message "packages are likely to be broken by the reinstalls". This seems to me to contradict the whole purpose of sandboxing, which I had believed was supposed to avoid this kind of error.
Can anybody explain this error for me, and even better help me proceed with the Elm install? Is it safe to add --force-reinstalls
?
Here are the sequence of commands I executed:
cabal sandbox init
cabal update
cabal install -j elm-compiler-0.14 elm-package-0.2 elm-make-0.1 elm-reactor-0.2 elm-repl-0.4
I'm using cabal 1.22.0.0 and GHC 7.8.2 on Mac OS 10.10. The full output as follows:
Resolving dependencies...
In order, the following would be installed:
Diff-0.3.0 (new package)
HUnit-1.2.5.2 (new package)
ansi-terminal-0.6.2.1 (new package)
ansi-wl-pprint-0.6.7.1 (new package)
async-2.0.2 (new package)
blaze-markup-0.6.2.0 (new package)
blaze-html-0.7.0.3 (new package)
byteable-0.1.1 (new package)
bytestring-mmap-0.2.2 (new package)
bytestring-trie-0.2.4 (new package)
cereal-0.4.1.1 (new package)
cmdargs-0.10.12 (new package)
concatenative-1.0.1 (new package)
cookie-0.4.1.4 (new package)
cryptohash-0.11.6 (new package)
enumerator-0.4.20 (new package)
attoparsec-enumerator-0.3.3 (new package)
blaze-builder-enumerator-0.2.0.6 (new package)
exceptions-0.6.1 (reinstall) changes: mtl-2.1.3.1 -> 2.2.1,
transformers-0.3.0.0 -> 0.4.1.0
extensible-exceptions-0.1.1.4 (new package)
hfsevents-0.1.5 (new package)
fsnotify-0.1.0.3 (new package)
hourglass-0.2.8 (new package)
asn1-types-0.3.0 (new package)
asn1-encoding-0.9.0 (new package)
asn1-parse-0.9.0 (new package)
crypto-pubkey-types-0.4.2.3 (new package)
http-types-0.8.5 (new package)
mime-types-0.1.0.5 (new package)
monads-tf-0.1.0.2 (reinstall) changes: transformers-0.3.0.0 -> 0.4.1.0
MonadCatchIO-transformers-0.3.1.3 (new package)
network-2.6.0.2 (new version)
parsec-3.1.7 (new version)
indents-0.3.3 (new package)
network-uri-2.6.0.1 (new package)
HTTP-4000.2.19 (new version)
pem-0.2.2 (new package)
prettyclass-1.0.0.0 (new package)
language-glsl-0.1.1 (new package)
publicsuffixlist-0.1 (new package)
regex-base-0.93.2 (new package)
regex-posix-0.95.2 (new package)
securemem-0.1.4 (new package)
crypto-cipher-types-0.0.9 (new package)
cipher-aes-0.2.9 (new package)
cipher-des-0.0.6 (new package)
cipher-rc4-0.1.4 (new package)
crypto-random-0.0.8 (new package)
cprng-aes-0.6.1 (new package)
crypto-numbers-0.2.7 (new package)
crypto-pubkey-0.2.7 (new package)
socks-0.5.4 (new package)
streaming-commons-0.1.8 (new package)
http-client-0.3.8.2 (latest: 0.4.6.2) (new package)
syb-0.4.4 (new package)
tagshare-0.0 (new package)
terminfo-0.4.0.0 (new package)
haskeline-0.7.1.3 (new package)
tf-random-0.5 (new package)
QuickCheck-2.7.6 (new package)
testing-feat-0.4.0.2 (new package)
transformers-compat-0.3.3.4 (new package)
optparse-applicative-0.10.0 (latest: 0.11.0.1) (new package)
union-find-0.2 (new package)
unix-compat-0.4.1.4 (new package)
unordered-containers-0.2.5.1 (new package)
aeson-0.8.0.2 +old-locale (new package)
aeson-pretty-0.7.2 (new package)
uniplate-1.6.12 (new package)
websockets-0.9.2.2 (new version)
wl-pprint-1.1 (new package)
language-ecmascript-0.16.2 (latest: 0.17) (new package)
elm-compiler-0.14 (new package)
x509-1.5.0.1 (new package)
x509-store-1.5.0 (new package)
x509-system-1.5.0 (new package)
x509-validation-1.5.1 (new package)
tls-1.2.13 (new package)
connection-0.2.3 (new package)
http-client-tls-0.2.2 (new package)
zip-archive-0.2.3.5 (new version)
elm-package-0.2 (latest: 0.2.2) (new package)
elm-make-0.1 (new package)
elm-repl-0.4 (new package)
zlib-enum-0.2.3.1 (new package)
snap-core-0.9.6.4 (new package)
snap-server-0.9.4.6 (new package)
websockets-snap-0.9.0.0 (new package)
elm-reactor-0.2 (latest: 0.2.0.1) (new package)
cabal: The following packages are likely to be broken by the reinstalls:
temporary-1.2.0.3
shellmate-0.1.6
Use --force-reinstalls if you want to install anyway.
UPDATE:
As requested, the output from cabal exec ghc-pkg list temporary
:
$ cabal exec ghc-pkg list temporary
/Applications/ghc-7.8.2.app/Contents/lib/ghc-7.8.2/package.conf.d
temporary-1.2.0.3
/Users/nbartlett/Development/Elm-Platform/tmp/.cabal-sandbox/x86_64-osx-ghc-7.8.2-packages.conf.d
You have installed shellmate
and temporary
(and potentially a few other packages -- especially dependencies of these) into your global package database, which is also visible from within sandboxes. The error is saying that:
The upshot of all this is that C will probably be broken after the reinstallation of B, since it will link to B expecting this to drag in A-1, but A-2 will be drug in instead. In your particular case, both shellmate
and temporary
are playing the role of C, and for each of them at least one of exceptions-0.6.1
or monads-tf-0.1.0.2
is playing the role of B
.
You have many choices; the most attractive to me are:
Remove shellmate
and temporary
from your global package database. These will no longer be available, but this way is certain to prevent a lot of problems.
ghc-pkg unregister --global shellmate
ghc-pkg unregister --global temporary
Reinstall shellmate
and temporary
in your global package database with updated dependencies. This may or may not work.
cabal install --reinstall --global shellmate-0.1.6 temporary-1.2.0.3 mtl-2.2.1 transformers-0.4.1.0
Ignore the warnings and force reinstalls. It is likely that shellmate
and temporary
will be unusable from within the sandbox.
cabal install elm --force-reinstalls # from within the sandbox
Install elm, shellmate, and temporary all into the sandbox. It is possible that this will still give you warnings, but they may safely be ignored: within the sandbox, you expect to use the sandbox versions (hence the "broken" global packages won't matter), and outside the sandbox the global packages will not be broken.
cabal install elm temporary shellmate # possibly with --force-reinstalls
I had what looks like the same problem while trying to install multiple packages at the same time. One package A depended on package B and A and B depended on different versions of package C. (That is my mental model of the situation anyway).
My particular installation blockage was cleared [*] by installing the packages separately instead of all at once. Instead of one command with N packages, I had N commands with one package at a time.
[*] Since I am not certain about the cause of my problem, I can also not be certain about exactly what resolved it.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With