I tried VS2015 with my exisiting solution and I get some valid new errors (like unreachable code that the compiler didn't catch before), but I also get an error for example on this line:
bool bWasAlreadyLocked = false;
oEnv.LockDoc(oWarnings, oEventDoc, ref bWasAlreadyLocked);
I get the following error:
Error CS1503 Argument 3: cannot convert from 'ref bool [mscorlib, Version=4.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089]' to 'ref bool [mscorlib, Version=4.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089]'
I cannot see why it would throw that error, obviously the types do match. Is this a bug in the new compiler or has the behaviour of the ref
keyword changed?
The function in this case is a C++ function which is imported to C# using a c# class derived from the c++ class. It's signature is this:
void CBkgDocEnvX::LockDoc(
CFIWarningList ^oWarnings,
CBaseDoc ^oBaseDoc,
// Output
bool %rbWasAlreadyLocked)
It might be good to mention that I opted to use the VS2013 c++ compiler for the c++ sources in the solution for now, so the c++ side should be the same as before. My guess is that something in the interop between c# and c++ changed.
%d is used to print decimal(integer) number ,while %c is used to print character . If you try to print a character with %d format the computer will print the ASCII code of the character.
In the real sense it has no meaning or full form. It was developed by Dennis Ritchie and Ken Thompson at AT&T bell Lab. First, they used to call it as B language then later they made some improvement into it and renamed it as C and its superscript as C++ which was invented by Dr.
In C programming language, %d and %i are format specifiers as where %d specifies the type of variable as decimal and %i specifies the type as integer. In usage terms, there is no difference in printf() function output while printing a number using %d or %i but using scanf the difference occurs.
C is a general-purpose language that most programmers learn before moving on to more complex languages. From Unix and Windows to Tic Tac Toe and Photoshop, several of the most commonly used applications today have been built on C. It is easy to learn because: A simple syntax with only 32 keywords.
You should check this point just to be sure.
You can find more information here.
I get those kinds of compiler errors when two projects are of incompatible types. Often times Visual Studio will allow me to add a reference to a Portable Class Library project (or .NET 4.0 project) even when the assembly being referenced is not supported by the referencing project's .NET profile type.
The most common occurrence for me is when using a .NET 4.0 project and trying to reference a Probable Class Library project that specifies .NET 4.5 in its profile settings rather than the older .NET 4 version. When I reference the PCL assembly from my .NET 4.0 project I continue to get full intellisense support (e.g. when editing the source code intellisense will display all the namespaces, classes and properties contained inside the assembly being referenced) But at compile time I get the same kind of error you're getting; more specifically when I compile the solution the compile indicates a library mismatch, but lists the exact same library, version, and public key it says it's looking for.
Check the project properties, verify they're compatible.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With