I'm using SFINAE in the style of this answer in order to call a generic vector object by using an appropriate member function. For example, the following code calls operator[](int) const
first, and if that doesn't exist then operator()(int) const
:
template<int I> struct rank : rank<I-1> { static_assert(I > 0, ""); };
template<> struct rank<0> {};
template<typename VectorType>
struct VectorWrapper
{
auto get(int i) const
{
return get(v, i, rank<5>());
}
template<typename V, typename = std::enable_if_t<has_bracket_operator<const V>::value> >
auto get(V const& v, int i, rank<2>) const
{
return v[i];
}
template<typename V, typename = std::enable_if_t<has_parenthesis_operator<const V>::value> >
auto get(V const& v, int i, rank<1>) const
{
return v(i);
}
VectorType v;
};
With the has_bracket_operator
and has_parenthesis_operator
traits set up as suggested in this thread, the whole compiles and seems to work.
However, passing the member vector to the overloaded class templates seems unnecessary from the first, so I tried to set up the same without passing it. For this, I replaced the template parameter V
with the VectorType
parameter used to set up the class template:
template<typename = std::enable_if_t<has_bracket_operator<VectorType>::value> >
auto get(int i, rank<2>) const
{
return v[i];
}
template<typename = std::enable_if_t<has_parenthesis_operator<VectorType>::value> >
auto get(int i, rank<1>) const
{
return v(i);
}
Now, however, the compilation fails (in gcc 5.1.0) with the following error message:
/usr/local/include/c++/5.1.0/type_traits: In substitution of 'template<bool _Cond, class _Tp> using enable_if_t = typename std::enable_if::type [with bool _Cond = has_parenthesis_operator<std::vector<int> >::value; _Tp = void]':
main.cpp:46:10: required from 'struct VectorWrapper<std::vector<int> >'
main.cpp:59:38: required from here
/usr/local/include/c++/5.1.0/type_traits:2388:61: error: no type named 'type' in 'struct std::enable_if<false, void>'
using enable_if_t = typename enable_if<_Cond, _Tp>::type;
DEMO
Questions:
A template argument for a template template parameter is the name of a class template. When the compiler tries to find a template to match the template template argument, it only considers primary class templates. (A primary template is the template that is being specialized.)
A template parameter is a special kind of parameter that can be used to pass a type as argument: just like regular function parameters can be used to pass values to a function, template parameters allow to pass also types to a function.
what's the difference between template <typename T> and template <class T>? Nothing actually. typename is a designated keyword for this purpose but class is supported for backwards compatibility and historical reasons (before typename keyword was added).
Explanation: A template parameter is a special kind of parameter that can be used to pass a type as argument. 2. Which keyword can be used in template? a) class. b) typename.
SFINAE comes to us from [temp.deduct]/8, emphasis mine:
If a substitution results in an invalid type or expression, type deduction fails. An invalid type or expression is one that would be ill-formed, with a diagnostic required, if written using the substituted arguments. [ Note: If no diagnostic is required, the program is still ill-formed. Access checking is done as part of the substitution process. —end note ] Only invalid types and expressions in the immediate context of the function type and its template parameter types can result in a deduction failure.
The immediate context is what's in the template declaration. In your initial example:
template<typename V, typename = std::enable_if_t<has_bracket_operator<const V>::value> >
auto get(V const& v, int i, rank<2>) const
V
is in the immediate context, so a substitution failure on the enable_if
is just a deduction failure.
However, in your second example:
template<typename = std::enable_if_t<has_bracket_operator<VectorType>::value> >
auto get(int i, rank<2>) const
VectorType
is not in the immediate context of get
, so a failure here would not be a deduction failure, it would be a hard error.
Unless VectorType
happens to have all of these operators.
The solution to any template problem is to just add more template. In this case, force VectorType
to be in the immediate context by introducing another type:
template<typename T=VectorType, typename = std::enable_if_t<has_bracket_operator<T>::value> >
auto get(int i, rank<2>) const
And call get<>()
.
In your failing example, the template parameter VectorType
has already been determined by the time get is being resolved. To make SFINAE work, you need to make the template parameters you are using for SFINAE resolve at that method call. The following is a modification of your first example to work like you want to:
template<int I> struct rank : rank<I-1> { static_assert(I > 0, ""); };
template<> struct rank<0> {};
template<typename VectorType>
struct VectorWrapper
{
auto get(int i) const
{
return get(v, i, rank<5>());
}
template<typename V=VectorType, typename = std::enable_if_t<has_bracket_operator<const V>::value> >
auto get(int i, rank<2>) const
{
return v[i];
}
template<typename V=VectorType, typename = std::enable_if_t<has_parenthesis_operator<const V>::value> >
auto get(int i, rank<1>) const
{
return v(i);
}
VectorType v;
};
This way, V
is resolved when get
is called, and it will correctly use SFINAE.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With