In the following C++ code, a template placeholder in argument of function fun1, and in the return type of function ret1, does not compile:
template <typename T = int>
class type {
T data;
};
void fun1(type arg); // Error: template placeholder not permitted in this context
void fun2(type<> arg); // Ok
void fun3(type<int> arg); // Ok
type ret1(); // Error: Deduced class type 'type' in function return type
type<> ret2(); // Ok
type<int> ret3(); // Ok
int main() {
type var1; // Ok!!!!!!
type<> var2; // Ok
type<int> var3; // Ok
}
But, var1 is ok.
var1 compile, but fun1 and ret1 do not?var1 benefits from CTAD, where all non-defaulted template arguments (i.e. none) can be deduced from the initialisation. Both function declarations however, are not candidates for CTAD, so the template argument list must be supplied even if that list is empty.
Deduction for class templates
Implicitly-generated deduction guides
When, in a function-style cast or in a variable's declaration, the type specifier consists solely of the name of a primary class template C (i.e., there is no accompanying template argument list), candidates for deduction are formed as follows:
...
(emphasis added)
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With