Possible Duplicates:
GCC problem : using a member of a base class that depends on a template argument
Why does GCC need extra declarations in templates when VS does not?
Why doesn’t a derived template class have access to a base template class
iphone compiler inherited templated base classes with passed through type not being expanded in time (just look)
Sorry for the confusing title, best I could come up with.
Here's some code to illustrate my problem...
A base template class:
template<class T> class TestBase
{
public:
int someInt;
};
Attempting to subclass TestBase with another template class...
This gets "someInt was not declared in this scope" at compile time:
template<class X> class TestSub : public TestBase<X>
{
void testf()
{
someInt = 0; //Error: "someInt was not declared in this scope"
}
};
B)
This works fine (the difference being that I specify TestBase's template input explicitly)
template<class X> class TestSub : public TestBase<string>
{
void testf()
{
someInt = 0;
}
};
Why does TestSub from (A) not inherit someInt correctly as it does in (B)?
Thanks in advance.
Because TestBase could be specialized on X whatever X ends up being. Therefore you need to let the compile know someInt is a dependent value by fully qualifying it. Instead of
someInt = 0
say rather
TestBase<X>::someInt = 0
You could also use
this->someInt = 0
The point is the compiler will not assume a name is dependent on a template parameter it must know it is before it defers that check to instantiation time. For an experiment see what happens when you introduce a global someInt.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With