In C# I have the following function definition:
public static TResult SomeParentFunctionName<TSource, TResult>(TSource SomeValue,Func<TSource, TResult> ChildFunction1, Func<TSource, TResult> ChildFunction2)
This function takes SomeValue
and then calls ChildFunction1
and ChildFunction2
According to my business rules, I always need to run ChildFunction1
, but only sometimes need to run ChildFunction2
.
Can I make ChildFunction2
an optional parameter? How do I go about doing that? And how do I know if it has been passed in.
1) I could create two SomeParentFunctionName
functions, one with ChildFunction2
and one without.
2) I could pass in a blank function that just won't do anything - but that's not good practice.
Note: to those who want to start yelling at this question, if you can't help, just don't.
In the real sense it has no meaning or full form. It was developed by Dennis Ritchie and Ken Thompson at AT&T bell Lab. First, they used to call it as B language then later they made some improvement into it and renamed it as C and its superscript as C++ which was invented by Dr.
C programming language is a machine-independent programming language that is mainly used to create many types of applications and operating systems such as Windows, and other complicated programs such as the Oracle database, Git, Python interpreter, and games and is considered a programming foundation in the process of ...
Quote from wikipedia: "A successor to the programming language B, C was originally developed at Bell Labs by Dennis Ritchie between 1972 and 1973 to construct utilities running on Unix." The creators want that everyone "see" his language. So he named it "C".
Sure, just set it to null:
public static TResult SomeParentFunctionName<TSource, TResult>(
TSource SomeValue,
Func<TSource, TResult> ChildFunction1,
Func<TSource, TResult> ChildFunction2 = null)
{
...
if (ChildFunction2 != null)
ChildFunction2();
}
If you want to pass in a func for ChildFunction2
, go ahead and do it. If you don't want to pass anything for it just omit it when calling the function.
This is actually exactly what you were calling it - optional argument
There is a 3rd option. Use the params
keyword to indicate that the function takes a variable number of arguments. But, then you need to handle the case where no Func<TSource, TResult>
objects are passed.
If your always going to need either 1 or 2 Func<TSource, TResult>
objects, then overloading the function as you suggest in option 1 is the most common way to handle the situation.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With