In C#, I have a simple 3D vector class.
static void Main(string[] args)
{
Vector3D a, b;
a = new Vector3D(0, 5, 10);
b = new Vector3D(0, 0, 0);
b = a;
a.x = 10;
Console.WriteLine("vector a=" + a.ToString());
Console.WriteLine("vector b=" + b.ToString());
Console.ReadKey();
}
the output is,
vector a= 10, 5, 10
vector b= 10, 5, 10
I assign a before i change a.x to 10. So i was expecting
vector a= 10, 5, 10
vector b= 0, 5, 10
From what i understand = operator assigns a reference to object like a pointer? And in C# i cant overload = operator.
Do i have to manually assign each property?
Yes, because Vecor3D is a class this is quite correct.
Classes are reference types and your b = a;
statement does not copy a Vector3D instance but a reference to an instance.
If you want to 'clone' the instances, you could add the IClonable interface, but that is more or less abandoned.
A better solution for an <X,Y,Z>
type might be to make it a struct. Structs are values types and the meaning of b = a;
would change (towards what you want).
A 3D point meets all the criteria for a struct (small, no identity). The preferred way is to design it as immutable.
Yes, "= operator assigns a reference to object like a pointer", as you put it. Thus, both a
and b
reference the same single object in memory. (The object previously referenced by b
is not referenced any more and will be garbage collected.)
There are multiple ways to overcome this problem:
Make Vector3D
a struct instead of a class. Structs are value types instead of reference types, so b = a
copies the contents of a
to variable b
.
Implement a Clone
method in your Vector3D
class (previously, this would mean implementing ICloneable
, but this is no longer recommended). Alternatively, you could create a Vector3D
constructor that takes another vector as a parameter and creates a copy.
Manually copy the three values yourself (b = new Vector3D(a.x, a.y, a.z)
), if you cannot change the implementation of Vector3D
.
You may want to change your Vector3D
class to a struct. That would let you work with a value type instead of a reference type.
Your other option is to implement ICloneable
or use some other method to create a deep copy of your object.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With