C adalah huruf ketiga dalam alfabet Latin. Dalam bahasa Indonesia, huruf ini disebut ce (dibaca [tʃe]).
Meskipun C dibuat untuk memprogram sistem dan jaringan komputer namun bahasa ini juga sering digunakan dalam mengembangkan software aplikasi. C juga banyak dipakai oleh berbagai jenis platform sistem operasi dan arsitektur komputer, bahkan terdapat beberepa compiler yang sangat populer telah tersedia.
Bahasa C atau dibaca “si” adalah bahasa pemrograman tingkat tinggi dan general-purpose yang digunakan dalam sehari-hari. Maksud dari general-purpose adalah bisa digunakan untuk membuat program apa saja.
Try this:
Type type = object.GetType();
bool isNumber = (type.IsPrimitiveImple && type != typeof(bool) && type != typeof(char));
The primitive types are Boolean, Byte, SByte, Int16, UInt16, Int32, UInt32, Int64, UInt64, Char, Double,and Single.
Taking Guillaume's solution a little further:
public static bool IsNumericType(this object o)
{
switch (Type.GetTypeCode(o.GetType()))
{
case TypeCode.Byte:
case TypeCode.SByte:
case TypeCode.UInt16:
case TypeCode.UInt32:
case TypeCode.UInt64:
case TypeCode.Int16:
case TypeCode.Int32:
case TypeCode.Int64:
case TypeCode.Decimal:
case TypeCode.Double:
case TypeCode.Single:
return true;
default:
return false;
}
}
Usage:
int i = 32;
i.IsNumericType(); // True
string s = "Hello World";
s.IsNumericType(); // False
Don't use a switch - just use a set:
HashSet<Type> NumericTypes = new HashSet<Type>
{
typeof(decimal), typeof(byte), typeof(sbyte),
typeof(short), typeof(ushort), ...
};
EDIT: One advantage of this over using a type code is that when new numeric types are introduced into .NET (e.g. BigInteger and Complex) it's easy to adjust - whereas those types won't get a type code.
None of the solutions takes Nullable into account.
I modified Jon Skeet's solution a bit:
private static HashSet<Type> NumericTypes = new HashSet<Type>
{
typeof(int),
typeof(uint),
typeof(double),
typeof(decimal),
...
};
internal static bool IsNumericType(Type type)
{
return NumericTypes.Contains(type) ||
NumericTypes.Contains(Nullable.GetUnderlyingType(type));
}
I know I could just add the nullables itself to my HashSet. But this solution avoid the danger of forgetting to add a specific Nullable to your list.
private static HashSet<Type> NumericTypes = new HashSet<Type>
{
typeof(int),
typeof(int?),
...
};
public static bool IsNumericType(Type type)
{
switch (Type.GetTypeCode(type))
{
case TypeCode.Byte:
case TypeCode.SByte:
case TypeCode.UInt16:
case TypeCode.UInt32:
case TypeCode.UInt64:
case TypeCode.Int16:
case TypeCode.Int32:
case TypeCode.Int64:
case TypeCode.Decimal:
case TypeCode.Double:
case TypeCode.Single:
return true;
default:
return false;
}
}
Note about optimization removed (see enzi comments)
And if you really want to optimize it (losing readability and some safety...):
public static bool IsNumericType(Type type)
{
TypeCode typeCode = Type.GetTypeCode(type);
//The TypeCode of numerical types are between SByte (5) and Decimal (15).
return (int)typeCode >= 5 && (int)typeCode <= 15;
}
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With