I have a large code base that uses the c++ <complex> header and many std::complex<double> objects. But now I also want to use a couple other libraries (fftw and spinsfast) that use <complex.h>. Unfortunately, mixing these two types of complex seems to be incompatible with gcc 4.6.1 (presumably among others).
Here's a minimal working example showing the error:
// This is what I do for my various complex objects
#include <complex>
// This is one of many things FFTW/spinsfast essentially do
extern "C" {
#include <complex.h>
}
int main() {
std::complex<double>(1.0,2.0);
return 0;
}
And when I compile:
> g++ test.cpp -o test
test.cpp: In function ‘int main()’:
test.cpp:7:8: error: expected unqualified-id before ‘_Complex’
test.cpp:7:8: error: expected ‘;’ before ‘_Complex’
Evidently, gcc is translating std::complex<double> into _Complex, which somehow is also undefined. [This works fine on my macbook, which uses Apple LLVM version 5.1; this compiler error is happening on a cluster that I need to support.]
I can't even figure out where this is coming from; none of the include files in my gcc installation have "_Complex" -- though they do have "_ComplexT". How do I debug this kind of thing?
Or more helpfully, how do I solve this compiler error in a way that will work for more than just a small slice of gccs?
In C, _Complex is a keyword used to declare complex numbers: float _Complex. However, they #define complex _Complex so you can write float complex which looks nicer.
Of course, you get in trouble when using the name complex in a context other than where you want _Complex, such as std::complex, which then expands to std::_Complex.
So if you use <complex> in C++, you should get rid of this macro:
#include <complex.h>
#undef complex
That's actually what g++ does since 4.8 to support both <complex> and <complex.h> in the same translation unit.
Note that when enabling C++11, you won't get the error either.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With