First of all, I know this is not the best way to do this, I'm just looking how it should be done. I created a class called bord,which holds a member
std::unique_ptr<std::unique_ptr<char>[] > char_bord;
Which should be the correct syntax, then I try to initialize this in the constructor:
bord::bord():char_bord(new std::unique_ptr<char>[10])
{
//char_bord=new std::unique_ptr<char>[10]; //This did not seem to work aswell.
for(int i=0;i<10;i++)
char_bord[i]=new std::unique_ptr<char>[](new char[10]);
return;
}
This results in the following heap of errors, which I did not manage to decipher.
jelmer@jelmer-N56JN:~/Git/Board/lib$ g++ -std=c++0x bord.c
In file included from bord.c:1:0:
bord.h:20:1: error: new types may not be defined in a return type
class bord
^
bord.h:20:1: note: (perhaps a semicolon is missing after the definition of ‘bord’)
bord.c:3:12: error: return type specification for constructor invalid
bord::bord():char_bord(new std::unique_ptr<char>[10])
^
bord.c: In constructor ‘bord::bord()’:
bord.c:7:46: error: expected primary-expression before ‘]’ token
char_bord[i]=new std::unique_ptr<char>[](new char[10]);
^
bord.c:7:60: error: parenthesized initializer in array new [-fpermissive]
char_bord[i]=new std::unique_ptr<char>[](new char[10]);
^
bord.c:7:19: error: no match for ‘operator=’ (operand types are ‘std::unique_ptr<char>’ and ‘std::unique_ptr<char>*’)
char_bord[i]=new std::unique_ptr<char>[](new char[10]);
^
bord.c:7:19: note: candidates are:
In file included from /usr/include/c++/4.9/memory:81:0,
from bord.h:19,
from bord.c:1:
/usr/include/c++/4.9/bits/unique_ptr.h:249:7: note: std::unique_ptr<_Tp, _Dp>& std::unique_ptr<_Tp, _Dp>::operator=(std::unique_ptr<_Tp, _Dp>&&) [with _Tp = char; _Dp = std::default_delete<char>]
operator=(unique_ptr&& __u) noexcept
^
/usr/include/c++/4.9/bits/unique_ptr.h:249:7: note: no known conversion for argument 1 from ‘std::unique_ptr<char>*’ to ‘std::unique_ptr<char>&&’
/usr/include/c++/4.9/bits/unique_ptr.h:269:2: note: template<class _Up, class _Ep> typename std::enable_if<std::__and_<std::is_convertible<typename std::unique_ptr<_Up, _Ep>::pointer, typename std::unique_ptr<_Tp, _Dp>::_Pointer::type>, std::__not_<std::is_array<_Up> > >::value, std::unique_ptr<_Tp, _Dp>&>::type std::unique_ptr<_Tp, _Dp>::operator=(std::unique_ptr<_Up, _Ep>&&) [with _Up = _Up; _Ep = _Ep; _Tp = char; _Dp = std::default_delete<char>]
operator=(unique_ptr<_Up, _Ep>&& __u) noexcept
^
/usr/include/c++/4.9/bits/unique_ptr.h:269:2: note: template argument deduction/substitution failed:
bord.c:7:19: note: mismatched types ‘std::unique_ptr<_Tp, _Dp>’ and ‘std::unique_ptr<char>*’
char_bord[i]=new std::unique_ptr<char>[](new char[10]);
^
In file included from /usr/include/c++/4.9/memory:81:0,
from bord.h:19,
from bord.c:1:
/usr/include/c++/4.9/bits/unique_ptr.h:278:7: note: std::unique_ptr<_Tp, _Dp>& std::unique_ptr<_Tp, _Dp>::operator=(std::nullptr_t) [with _Tp = char; _Dp = std::default_delete<char>; std::nullptr_t = std::nullptr_t]
operator=(nullptr_t) noexcept
^
/usr/include/c++/4.9/bits/unique_ptr.h:278:7: note: no known conversion for argument 1 from ‘std::unique_ptr<char>*’ to ‘std::nullptr_t’
What am I doing wrong, assuming I am doing something wrong.
Here is some code that demonstrates what i think you want:
#include <iostream>
#include <algorithm>
#include <iterator>
#include <memory>
using namespace std;
using array_ptr_type = std::unique_ptr<char[]>;
using array_of_arrays_type = std::unique_ptr<array_ptr_type[]>;
auto main() -> int
{
auto x = array_ptr_type(new char[10]);
auto y = array_ptr_type(new char[10]);
for (int i = 0 ; i < 10 ; ++i)
{
x[i] = char('0' + i);
y[i] = char('0' + 9 - i);
}
auto pxy = array_of_arrays_type(new array_ptr_type[2]);
pxy[0] = move(x);
pxy[1] = move(y);
for (int i = 0 ; i < 2 ; ++i) {
copy(&pxy[i][0], &pxy[i][10], ostream_iterator<char>(cout, ", "));
cout << endl;
}
return 0;
}
expected output:
0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,
9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, 0,
Of course as you know, none of this is recommended - vector<vector<char>>
would be a lot cleaner and more maintainable.
You have to use specialization:
std::unique_ptr<char[]> chars(new char[1024]);
That is because std::unique_ptr
does not support custom deleter as std::shared_ptr
does (in this style of writing).
std::unique_ptr
uses std::default_delete
as deleter. Shortly, if you specify argument type as class T
it will use default delete
but if you write class T[]
(in this specialization) std::unique_ptr
will use delete[]
.
But it is better to use some container and not c-style arrays.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With