I've been looking at some articles about local functions, and the one sentence states:
Local functions are defined within a method and aren't available outside of it
So given the below code example is there any way to unit test the square
method?
int SumAndSquare(int x, int y)
{
var sum = x + y;
return square(sum);
int square(int z)
{
return z * z;
}
}
In general you can't in a maintainable way for non-trivial local functions (reason explained in a comment to this response). A local function that uses variables of the method where it is defined (so a non-trivial one, ones that don't use local variables could be private methods) has a special parameter containing these variables. You can't easily recreate this parameter → you can't call it.
It can be easily seen in TryRoslyn (how much I love TryRoslyn! I use it very often 😁)
int Foo()
{
int b = 5;
return valueofBplusX(5);
int valueofBplusX(int x)
{
return b + x;
}
}
is translated in something like:
[CompilerGenerated]
[StructLayout(LayoutKind.Auto)]
private struct <>c__DisplayClass0_0
{
public int b;
}
private int Foo()
{
C.<>c__DisplayClass0_0 <>c__DisplayClass0_ = default(C.<>c__DisplayClass0_0);
<>c__DisplayClass0_.b = 5;
return C.<Foo>g__valueofBplusX0_0(5, ref <>c__DisplayClass0_);
}
[CompilerGenerated]
internal static int <Foo>g__valueofBplusX0_0(int x, ref C.<>c__DisplayClass0_0 ptr)
{
return ptr.b + x;
}
You see the <>c__DisplayClass0_0
that contains the b
local variable, and the <Foo>g__valueofBplusX0_0
that receives as the second argument a ref C.<>c__DisplayClass0_0 ptr
?
On top of this, I'll add a quote of Keith Nicholas: Yes, don't Test private methods.... The idea of a unit test is to test the unit by its public 'API'.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With