Are there any self-balancing binary search tree (RED-BLACK, AVL or others) built-in types in Python 2.7 or Python 3.x?
I am looking for something equivalent to Java's TreeMap or TreeSet.
If there are no such built-ins, why have they been ommited? Is there a special reason, for not including such tools?
In Python, a binary tree can be represented in different ways with different data structures(dictionary, list) and class representations for a node. However, binarytree library helps to directly implement a binary tree. It also supports heap and binary search tree(BST).
First, we traverse the left subtree, then the right subtree and finally the root node. In the below python program, we use the Node class to create place holders for the root node as well as the left and right nodes. Then, we create an insert function to add data to the tree.
A Binary Search Tree (BST) is a tree in which all the nodes follow the below-mentioned properties.The left sub-tree of a node has a key less than or equal to its parent node's key.The right sub-tree of a node has a key greater than to its parent node's key.Thus, BST divides all its sub-trees into two segments; the left ...
Approach to Solve this ProblemTake input of nodes of a Binary Tree. Define a function to find the height of the tree. A Boolean function to check recursively if the height difference of left subtree and right subtree is not more than '1', then return True. Return the Result.
There's no special reason, to my knowledge - I'd guess that the reason is that for so many applications the highly-tuned dict
and set
implementations (which are hash tables) work well. They're good enough in most cases. There are definitely situations where you need the performance characteristics of balanced binary search trees (like ordered traversal based on key- rather than addition-order), but those are far enough off the beaten path that people are happy with grabbing a third-party package in that case.
I've had a good experience using the bintrees package on PyPI. This has implementations of unbalanced, AVL and red-black binary trees, in both pure Python and as extensions written in Cython.
I think the rest of the reason is essentially historical accident. If the person who wrote bintrees lobbied for its inclusion in the stdlib, and was willing to put up with the constraints that imposes on maintenance and releases, it would probably go in. (Although the Cython dependency would cause a problem, I'd guess.)
Algorithmic complexity:
For hash tables (like dicts or sets), insertion and lookup are O(1), while for a balanced tree these are O(log(n)). In-order traversal of keys is O(n) in a tree, but to do the same thing with a hash table you need to sort the keys first, so it's O(n*log(n)). When you're picking which kind of data structure to use, you need to think about which operations you're going to be using, and pick the tradeoff that makes the most sense in your application.
You won't find any trees in the standard library. Python heavily uses dictionary that is hash table for its internal (object, classes and modules are all based on dicts). Therefore dicts has been greatly optimized. This make the needs for search trees much smaller. Also to be efficient such trees would have been implemented in an extension type.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With