I am building an object with a simple loop:
WebTarget target = getClient().target(u);
for (Entry<String, String> queryParam : queryParams.entrySet()) {
target = target.queryParam(queryParam.getKey(), queryParam.getValue());
}
I want to do the same thing using the Java8 Stream API but I cannot figure out how to do it. What makes me struggle is that target is reassigned every time, so a simple .forEach() will not work. I guess I need to use a .collect() or reduce() since I am looking for a single return value but I am lost at the moment!
Stream<String> stream = Stream. of("a", "b", "c"). filter(element -> element. contains("b")); Optional<String> anyElement = stream.
Stream builder() returns a builder for a Stream. Syntax : static <T> Stream. Builder<T> builder() where, T is the type of elements.
The builder pattern is a design pattern that allows for the step-by-step creation of complex objects using the correct sequence of actions. The construction is controlled by a director object that only needs to know the type of object it is to create.”
The builder pattern simplifies the creation of objects. It also simplifies the code as your do not have to call a complex constructor or call several setter methods on the created object. The builder pattern can be used to create an immutable class.
It's not very difficult to implement a correct foldLeft
for Java 8 streams:
@SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
public static <T, U> U foldLeft(Stream<T> stream,
U identity, BiFunction<U, ? super T, U> accumulator) {
Object[] result = new Object[] { identity };
stream.forEachOrdered(t -> result[0] = accumulator.apply((U) result[0], t));
return (U) result[0];
}
Or in type-safe manner:
public static <T, U> U foldLeft(Stream<T> stream,
U identity, BiFunction<U, ? super T, U> accumulator) {
class Box {
U value;
Box(U value) { this.value = value; }
}
Box result = new Box(identity);
stream.forEachOrdered(t -> result.value = accumulator.apply(result.value, t));
return result.value;
}
This works correctly for sequential and parallel streams. You can even have a speed gain using parallel streams if your stream has some CPU-consuming stateless intermediate operations like map
: in this case the next element can be processed by map
in the parallel with the current element processed by foldLeft
. I don't agree that such operation is not suitable for Stream API, because it can be correctly expressed via already existing forEachOrdered
.
I have this operation in my StreamEx library, so you can use it like this:
WebTarget target = EntryStream.of(queryParams).foldLeft(getClient().target(u),
(t, entry) -> t.queryParam(entry.getKey(), entry.getValue()))
There's unfortunately no foldLeft
method in the stream API. The reason for this is explained by Stuart Marks in this answer:
[...] Finally, Java doesn't provide
foldLeft
andfoldRight
operations because they imply a particular ordering of operations that is inherently sequential. This clashes with the design principle stated above of providing APIs that support sequential and parallel operation equally.
Ultimately what you're trying to do here is something procedural / sequential so I don't think the stream API is a good fit for this use case. I think the for-each loop that you have posted yourself is as good as it gets.
Update:
As @TagirValeev points out below you can in fact solve it with the stream API (using forEachOrdered
. Your code would then look something like
WebTarget[] arr = { getClient().target(u) };
queryParams.entrySet()
.stream()
.forEachOrdered(e -> arr[0] = arr[0].queryParam(e.getKey(),
e.getValue()));
WebTarget target = arr[0];
I stand by my original answer though, and claim that your good old for-loop is a better approach in this case.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With