I am facing issues in understanding Boyer Moore String Search algorithm.
I am following the following document. Link
I am not able to work out my way as to exactly what is the real meaning of delta1 and delta2 here, and how are they applying this to find string search algorithm. Language looked little vague..
Kindly if anybody out there can help me out in understanding this, it would be really helpful.
Or, if you know of any other link or document available that is easy to understand, then please share.
Thanks in advance.
Given a text txt[0..n-1] and a pattern pat[0.. m-1] where n is the length of the text and m is the length of the pattern, write a function search(char pat[], char txt[]) that prints all occurrences of pat[] in txt[]. You may assume that n > m.
The Boyer Moore algorithm is a searching algorithm in which a string of length n and a pattern of length m is searched. It prints all the occurrences of the pattern in the Text. Like the other string matching algorithms, this algorithm also preprocesses the pattern.
Boyer-Moore-Horspool is an algorithm for finding substrings into strings. This algorithm compares each characters of substring to find a word or the same characters into the string. When characters do not match, the search jumps to the next matching position in the pattern by the value indicated in the Bad Match Table.
In computer science, the Boyer–Moore string-search algorithm is an efficient string-searching algorithm that is the standard benchmark for practical string-search literature. It was developed by Robert S. Boyer and J Strother Moore in 1977.
The insight behind Boyer-Moore is that if you start searching for a pattern in a string starting with the last character in the pattern, you can jump your search forward multiple characters when you hit a mismatch.
Let's say our pattern p
is the sequence of characters p1
, p2
, ..., pn
and we are searching a string s
, currently with p
aligned so that pn
is at index i
in s
.
E.g.:
s = WHICH FINALLY HALTS. AT THAT POINT...
p = AT THAT
i = ^
The B-M paper makes the following observations:
(1) if we try matching a character that is not in p
then we can jump forward n
characters:
'F' is not in p
, hence we advance n
characters:
s = WHICH FINALLY HALTS. AT THAT POINT...
p = AT THAT
i = ^
(2) if we try matching a character whose last position is k
from the end of p
then we can jump forward k
characters:
' 's last position in p
is 4 from the end, hence we advance 4 characters:
s = WHICH FINALLY HALTS. AT THAT POINT...
p = AT THAT
i = ^
Now we scan backwards from i
until we either succeed or we hit a mismatch.
(3a) if the mismatch occurs k
characters from the start of p
and the mismatched character is not in p
, then we can advance (at least) k
characters.
'L' is not in p
and the mismatch occurred against p6
, hence we can advance (at least) 6 characters:
s = WHICH FINALLY HALTS. AT THAT POINT...
p = AT THAT
i = ^
However, we can actually do better than this.
(3b) since we know that at the old i
we'd already matched some characters (1 in this case). If the matched characters don't match the start of p
, then we can actually jump forward a little more (this extra distance is called 'delta2' in the paper):
s = WHICH FINALLY HALTS. AT THAT POINT...
p = AT THAT
i = ^
At this point, observation (2) applies again, giving
s = WHICH FINALLY HALTS. AT THAT POINT...
p = AT THAT
i = ^
and bingo! We're done.
The algorithm is based on a simple principle. Suppose that I'm trying to match a substring of length m
. I'm going to first look at character at index m
. If that character is not in my string, I know that the substring I want can't start in characters at indices 1, 2, ... , m
.
If that character is in my string, I'll assume that it is at the last place in my string that it can be. I'll then jump back and start trying to match my string from that possible starting place. This piece of information is my first table.
Once I start matching from the beginning of the substring, when I find a mismatch, I can't just start from scratch. I could be partially through a match starting at a different point. For instance if I'm trying to match anand
in ananand
successfully match, anan
, realize that the following a
is not a d
, but I've just matched an
, and so I should jump back to trying to match my third character in my substring. This, "If I fail after matching x characters, I could be on the y'th character of a match" information is stored in the second table.
Note that when I fail to match the second table knows how far along in a match I might be based on what I just matched. The first table knows how far back I might be based on the character that I just saw which I failed to match. You want to use the more pessimistic of those two pieces of information.
With this in mind the algorithm works like this:
start at beginning of string
start at beginning of match
while not at the end of the string:
if match_position is 0:
Jump ahead m characters
Look at character, jump back based on table 1
If match the first character:
advance match position
advance string position
else if I match:
if I reached the end of the match:
FOUND MATCH - return
else:
advance string position and match position.
else:
pos1 = table1[ character I failed to match ]
pos2 = table2[ how far into the match I am ]
if pos1 < pos2:
jump back pos1 in string
set match position at beginning
else:
set match position to pos2
FAILED TO MATCH
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With