m_io_service.post(boost::ref(i));
I have this call in a section of code, the underlying type i
is definetly a callable (because removing the boost::ref leads to pass by value, which works fine), however clang tells me that :
/opt/dev_64_swat/proto-rpc2/dependencies/boost/include/boost/asio/handler_invoke_hook.hpp:64:3: error: type 'boost::reference_wrapper<rubble::rpc::TcpFrontEndConnectionInvoker>' does not provide a call operator
How do I pass by reference, I have objects that outlive the asynchronous calls, and they would be more elegant (less boost::shared_ptr<..> 's as members) if I could pass them by reference.
-- edit --
I have grepped through the example directory of asio, and boost::ref
is not demonstrated for completion handlers. So I guess I am out of luck here. Is there a reason why the handlers don't have version accepting ref's ?
-- edit 2 : what I Looks like(don't bother looking at this unless you are suspicious of the implementation). --
namespace rubble { namespace rpc {
struct InProcessInvoker : public InvokerBase
{
struct notification_object_
{
typedef notification_object_ * ptr;
notification_object_()
{
reset();
}
void reset()
{
ready = false;
}
bool ready;
boost::mutex mutex;
boost::condition_variable cond;
};
InProcessInvoker(BackEnd & b_in)
: b(b_in),
notification_object(new notification_object_())
{
b.connect(m_client_data);
}
~InProcessInvoker()
{
if( m_client_data.unique() )
{
b.disconect(m_client_data);
delete notification_object;
}
}
bool is_useable()
{
return b.is_useable();
}
void reset()
{
notification_object->reset();
m_client_data->request().Clear();
m_client_data->response().Clear();
m_client_data->error_code().clear();
BOOST_ASSERT_MSG( m_client_data->is_rpc_active() == false,
"THE FLAG THAT REPRESENTS ACTIVE "
"RPC SHOULD NOT BE SET WHEN RESETING AN OBJECT FOR RPC");
}
void invoke()
{
b.invoke(*this);
}
void operator() ()
{
service->dispatch(*client_cookie,*m_client_data);
b.end_rpc(m_client_data.get());
boost::lock_guard<boost::mutex> lock(notification_object->mutex);
notification_object->ready=true;
notification_object->cond.notify_one();
}
void after_post()
{
boost::unique_lock<boost::mutex> lock(notification_object->mutex);
if(!notification_object->ready)
notification_object->cond.wait(lock);
}
notification_object_::ptr notification_object;
BackEnd & b;
};
} }
boost::ref
doesn't provide an overload of operator()
. Hence, the return cannot be used directly as a callback. There are 2 options:
C++03: Use boost::bind
to wrap the ref, and it will do what you want
m_io_service.post(boost::bind<ReturnType>(boost::ref(i)))
Note that you have to specify the return type unless the original functor i
has a typedef for result_type
C++11: Use std::ref
instead, which does provide an operator() which passes through to the contained reference
m_io_service.post(std::ref(i))
Seems boost::ref
is not intended for such usage. boost::ref
provides wrapper so it's questionable what would be more effective, to pass by value or by boost::ref
, mostly depends on your callable object copy constructor. As a workaround you can use boost::bind
:
m_io_service.post(boost::bind(&Callable::operator(), &i));
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With