im using code as below to check for the URL validation:
 public static bool CheckURLValid(string strURL)
  {
       Uri uriResult;
       return Uri.TryCreate(strURL, UriKind.Absolute, out uriResult) && uriResult.Scheme == Uri.UriSchemeHttp;
  }
The result as below should show all as true, but somehow it has its own pattern to validate the url:
false: google.com
true: http://www.google.com
false: https://www.google.com.my/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&es_th=1&ie=UTF-8#newwindow=1&q=check%20if%20valid%20url%20c%23
true: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/ask
im using c#, how to enhance this checking url validation to be more accurate?
You can use the URLConstructor to check if a string is a valid URL. URLConstructor ( new URL(url) ) returns a newly created URL object defined by the URL parameters. A JavaScript TypeError exception is thrown if the given URL is not valid.
Link validation pings the destination of a URL and tests for errors. This helps avoid broken and invalid links in your published document, and is especially useful for bloggers.
A typical URL could have the form http://www.example.com/index.html , which indicates a protocol ( http ), a hostname ( www.example.com ), and a file name ( index. html ).
Your CheckURLValid is returning exactly what you have told it to.
To return True on all 4 URLs here are the issues
false: google.com
This is a relative url and you have specified UriKind.Absolute which means this is false.
false: https://www.google.com.my/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&es_th=1&ie=UTF-8#newwindow=1&q=check%20if%20valid%20url%20c%23
This is an httpS (Secure) url and your method says
&& uriResult.Scheme == Uri.UriSchemeHttp;
which will limit you to only http addresses (NON secure)
To get the results you are wanting you will need to use the following method:
public static bool CheckURLValid(string strURL)
{
    Uri uriResult;
    return Uri.TryCreate(strURL, UriKind.RelativeOrAbsolute, out uriResult);
}
An alternative is to just use
Uri.IsWellFormedUriString(strURL, UriKind.RelativeOrAbsolute);
and not re implement functionality that all ready exists. If you wanted to wrap it it your own CheckUrlValid I would use the following:
public static bool CheckURLValid(string strURL)
{
    return Uri.IsWellFormedUriString(strURL, UriKind.RelativeOrAbsolute); ;
}
The main problem is that most strings are valid relative URL's so I would avoid using UriKind.RelativeOrAbsolute as google.com is an invalid url.  Most web browsers silently add HTTP:// to the string to make it a valid url.  HTTP://google.com is a valid url.
You can try
var isUrl = Uri.IsWellFormedUriString(strURL, UriKind.RelativeOrAbsolute);
It returns true on all four strings you wrote in your question.
Not sure if I'm missing something here, but just so others don't waste their time with Uri.IsWellFormedUriString, note that the following test fails:
[TestMethod]
public void TestURLValidation()
{
    bool result = Uri.IsWellFormedUriString("bad", UriKind.RelativeOrAbsolute);
    Assert.IsFalse(result);
}
I.e., the prescribed answer will consider "bad" as a valid address. I believe that's not the behavior most users are after.
This is the best solution without using Regex:
(note that for example using only "IsWellFormedUriString" will return true for "//")
    public static bool IsValidUrl(string url)
    {
        if (url == null)
        {
            return false;
        }
        try
        {
            Uri uriResult = new Uri(url);
            return Uri.IsWellFormedUriString(url, UriKind.RelativeOrAbsolute);
        }
        catch
        {
            return false;
        }
    }
For unit testing you can check the link where my function got nice results.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With