When you rotate your device and the screen changes orientation, Android usually destroys your application's existing Activities and Fragments and recreates them. Android does this so that your application can reload resources based on the new configuration.
If you want to manually handle orientation changes in your app you must declare the "orientation" , "screenSize" , and "screenLayout" values in the android:configChanges attributes. You can declare multiple configuration values in the attribute by separating them with a pipe | character.
Step #1: Make your AsyncTask
a static
nested class, or an entirely separate class, just not an inner (non-static nested) class.
Step #2: Have the AsyncTask
hold onto the Activity
via a data member, set via the constructor and a setter.
Step #3: When creating the AsyncTask
, supply the current Activity
to the constructor.
Step #4: In onRetainNonConfigurationInstance()
, return the AsyncTask
, after detaching it from the original, now-going-away activity.
Step #5: In onCreate()
, if getLastNonConfigurationInstance()
is not null
, cast it to your AsyncTask
class and call your setter to associate your new activity with the task.
Step #6: Do not refer to the activity data member from doInBackground()
.
If you follow the above recipe, it will all work. onProgressUpdate()
and onPostExecute()
are suspended between the start of onRetainNonConfigurationInstance()
and the end of the subsequent onCreate()
.
Here is a sample project demonstrating the technique.
Another approach is to ditch the AsyncTask
and move your work into an IntentService
. This is particularly useful if the work to be done may be long and should go on regardless of what the user does in terms of activities (e.g., downloading a large file). You can use an ordered broadcast Intent
to either have the activity respond to the work being done (if it is still in the foreground) or raise a Notification
to let the user know if the work has been done. Here is a blog post with more on this pattern.
The accepted answer was very helpful, but it doesn't have a progress dialog.
Fortunately for you, reader, I have created an extremely comprehensive and working example of an AsyncTask with a progress dialog!
I've toiled for a week to find a solution to this dilemma without resorting to editing the manifest file. The assumptions for this solution are:
Implementation
You will need to copy the two files found at the bottom of this post into your workspace. Just make sure that:
All your Activity
s should extend BaseActivity
In onCreate()
, super.onCreate()
should be called after you initialize any members that need to be accessed by your ASyncTask
s. Also, override getContentViewId()
to provide the form layout id.
Override onCreateDialog()
like usual to create dialogs managed by the activity.
See code below for a sample static inner class to make your AsyncTasks. You can store your result in mResult to access later.
final static class MyTask extends SuperAsyncTask<Void, Void, Void> {
public OpenDatabaseTask(BaseActivity activity) {
super(activity, MY_DIALOG_ID); // change your dialog ID here...
// and your dialog will be managed automatically!
}
@Override
protected Void doInBackground(Void... params) {
// your task code
return null;
}
@Override
public boolean onAfterExecute() {
// your after execute code
}
}
And finally, to launch your new task:
mCurrentTask = new MyTask(this);
((MyTask) mCurrentTask).execute();
That's it! I hope this robust solution will help someone.
BaseActivity.java (organize imports yourself)
protected abstract int getContentViewId();
public abstract class BaseActivity extends Activity {
protected SuperAsyncTask<?, ?, ?> mCurrentTask;
public HashMap<Integer, Boolean> mDialogMap = new HashMap<Integer, Boolean>();
@Override
protected void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState) {
super.onCreate(savedInstanceState);
setContentView(getContentViewId());
mCurrentTask = (SuperAsyncTask<?, ?, ?>) getLastNonConfigurationInstance();
if (mCurrentTask != null) {
mCurrentTask.attach(this);
if (mDialogMap.get((Integer) mCurrentTask.dialogId) != null
&& mDialogMap.get((Integer) mCurrentTask.dialogId)) {
mCurrentTask.postExecution();
}
}
}
@Override
protected void onPrepareDialog(int id, Dialog dialog) {
super.onPrepareDialog(id, dialog);
mDialogMap.put(id, true);
}
@Override
public Object onRetainNonConfigurationInstance() {
if (mCurrentTask != null) {
mCurrentTask.detach();
if (mDialogMap.get((Integer) mCurrentTask.dialogId) != null
&& mDialogMap.get((Integer) mCurrentTask.dialogId)) {
return mCurrentTask;
}
}
return super.onRetainNonConfigurationInstance();
}
public void cleanupTask() {
if (mCurrentTask != null) {
mCurrentTask = null;
System.gc();
}
}
}
SuperAsyncTask.java
public abstract class SuperAsyncTask<Params, Progress, Result> extends AsyncTask<Params, Progress, Result> {
protected BaseActivity mActivity = null;
protected Result mResult;
public int dialogId = -1;
protected abstract void onAfterExecute();
public SuperAsyncTask(BaseActivity activity, int dialogId) {
super();
this.dialogId = dialogId;
attach(activity);
}
@Override
protected void onPreExecute() {
super.onPreExecute();
mActivity.showDialog(dialogId); // go polymorphism!
}
protected void onPostExecute(Result result) {
super.onPostExecute(result);
mResult = result;
if (mActivity != null &&
mActivity.mDialogMap.get((Integer) dialogId) != null
&& mActivity.mDialogMap.get((Integer) dialogId)) {
postExecution();
}
};
public void attach(BaseActivity activity) {
this.mActivity = activity;
}
public void detach() {
this.mActivity = null;
}
public synchronized boolean postExecution() {
Boolean dialogExists = mActivity.mDialogMap.get((Integer) dialogId);
if (dialogExists != null || dialogExists) {
onAfterExecute();
cleanUp();
}
public boolean cleanUp() {
mActivity.removeDialog(dialogId);
mActivity.mDialogMap.remove((Integer) dialogId);
mActivity.cleanupTask();
detach();
return true;
}
}
Did someone from Google provide some "official solution"?
Yes.
The solution is more of an application architecture proposal rather that just some code.
They proposed 3 design patterns that allows an application to work in-sync with a server, regardless of the application state (it will work even if the user finishes the app, the user changes screen, the app gets terminated, every other possible state where a background data operation could be interrumpted, this covers it)
The proposal is explained in the Android REST client applications speech during Google I/O 2010 by Virgil Dobjanschi. It is 1 hour long, but it is extremely worth watching.
The basis of it is abstracting network operations to a Service
that works independently to any Activity
in the application. If you're working with databases, the use of ContentResolver
and Cursor
would give you an out-of-the-box Observer pattern that is convenient to update UI without any aditional logic, once you updated your local database with the fetched remote data. Any other after-operation code would be run via a callback passed to the Service
(I use a ResultReceiver
subclass for this).
Anyway, my explanation is actually pretty vague, you should definititely watch the speech.
While Mark's (CommonsWare) answer does indeed work for orientation changes, it fails if the Activity is destroyed directly (like in the case of a phone call).
You can handle the orientation changes AND the rare destroyed Activity events by using an Application object to reference your ASyncTask.
There's an excellent explanation of the problem and the solution here:
Credit goes completely to Ryan for figuring this one out.
After 4 years Google solved the problem just calling setRetainInstance(true) in Activity onCreate. It will preserve your activity instance during device rotation. I have also a simple solution for older Android.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With