asynchronous .js file loading syntax

Question

I noticed that there seems to be a couple of slightly different syntaxes for loading js files asynchronously, and I was wondering if there's any difference between the two, or if they both pretty much function the same. I'm guessing they work the same, but just wanted to make sure one method isn't better than the other for some reason. :)

Method One

(function() {
    var d=document,
    h=d.getElementsByTagName('head')[0],
    s=d.createElement('script');
    s.type='text/javascript';
    s.src='/js/myfile.js';
    h.appendChild(s);
})(); /* note ending parenthesis and curly brace */

Method Two (Saw this in Facebook's code)

(function() {
    var d=document,
    h=d.getElementsByTagName('head')[0],
    s=d.createElement('script');
    s.type='text/javascript';
    s.async=true;
    s.src='/js/myfile.js';
    h.appendChild(s);
}()); /* note ending parenthesis and curly brace */

Answer 1

The only difference that I notice is the s.async=true; in the Facebook method.

The async and defer attributes are boolean attributes that indicate how the script should be executed.

There are three possible modes that can be selected using these attributes. If the async attribute is present, then the script will be executed asynchronously, as soon as it is available. If the async attribute is not present but the defer attribute is present, then the script is executed when the page has finished parsing. If neither attribute is present, then the script is fetched and executed immediately, before the user agent continues parsing the page.

Source and Further reading: Whatwg.org HTML 5: The script element

As for the advantages, you may want to check what Google had to say on this last December:

• Google Analytics Launches Asynchronous Tracking