Do you assign a subclass object to a Superclass instance type only for overriding? Or are we doing this for something else also?
Example:
Sub is subtype of Super and
Super s = new Sub();
Please explain.
When someone writes code like this, he/she is trying to follow a basic OO design principle which says -
Program to an interface, not to a concrete implementation
I have explained this principle in one of my blog posts. Look in the Class Inheritance VS Interface Inheritance
section.
To summarize the post, when you use a reference of a parent type to refer to an instance of a sub-type, you get a lot of flexibility. For example, if you ever need to change your sub-type implementation in the future, you will be able to do that easily, without changing much of your code.
Consider the following method -
public void DoSomeStuff(Super s) {
s.someMethod();
}
and a call to this method -
DoSomeStuff(new Sub());
now, if you ever need to change the logic inside someMethod
, you can easily do it by declaring a new subtype of Super
, say NewSubType
, and changing the logic inside that implementation. In this way, you will never have to touch other existing code which utilizes that method. You will still be able to use your DoSomeStuff
method in the following way -
DoSomeStuff(new NewSubType());
Had you declared the parameter of DoSomeStuff
to be of Sub
, you would then have to change its implementation too -
DoSomeStuff(NewSubType s) {
s.someMethod();
}
and it may also chain/bubble to several other places.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With