When is using ASN.1 preferable to using JSON? What are some advantages and disadvantages of both approaches?
Because ASN. 1 is both human-readable and machine-readable, an ASN. 1 compiler can compile modules into libraries of code, codecs, that decode or encode the data structures.
ASN. 1, or Abstract Syntax Notation One, is an International Standards Organization (ISO) data representation format used to achieve interoperability between platforms. NCBI uses ASN. 1 for the storage and retrieval of data such as nucleotide and protein sequences, structures, genomes, PubMed records, and more.
ASN.1 and JSON aren't strictly comparable. JSON is a data format. ASN.1 is a schema language plus multiple sets of encoding rules, each of which produces different data formats for a given schema. So, the original question somewhat parallels the question "XML Schema vs. XML: when is it appropriate to use them?" A fairer comparison would be between ASN.1 and JSON Schema.
That said, a few points to consider:
You can use ASN.1 regardless of whether you need to serialize messages that might go to a recipient using C, C++, C#, Java, or any other programming language with ASN.1 encoder/decoder engine. ASN.1 also provides multiple encoding rules which have benefits under different circumstances. For example, DER is used when a canonical encoding is crucial, such as in digital certificates, while PER is used when bandwidth is critical such as in cellular protocols, and E-XER is used when you don't care about bandwidth and would like to display an encoding in XML for maniplulation in a browser or exchange messages with an XML Schema engine.
Note that with a good ASN.1 tool, you don't have to change you application code to switch between these ASN.1 encoding rules. A simple function call can select the encoding rules you would like to use.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With