So, I have the function -
def function(x): x , y = vector return exp(((-x**2/200))-0.5*(y+0.05*(x**2) - 100*0.05)**2)
and let's say that I would like to evaluate it at the following points (first column are the x-values and second column are the y-values) -
array([[-1.56113514, 4.51759732], [-2.80261623, 5.068371 ], [ 0.7792729 , 6.0169462 ], [-1.35672858, 3.52517478], [-1.92074891, 5.79966161], [-2.79340321, 4.73430001], [-2.79655868, 5.05361163], [-2.13637747, 5.39255837], [ 0.17341809, 3.60918261], [-1.22712921, 4.95327158]])
i.e. I would like to pass the function the first row of values and evaluate, then the second row and evaluate etc. and then the final result would be an array of the values evaluated at these points (so, an array consisting of 10 values).
So, for example, if the function was, say, a bivariate normal distribution -
def function2(x): function2 = (mvnorm.pdf(x,[0,0],[[1,0],[0,1]])) return function2
and I passed the above values into this function, I would get -
array([ 1.17738907e-05, 1.08383957e-04, 1.69855078e-04, 5.64757613e-06, 1.37432346e-05, 1.44032800e-04, 1.33426313e-05, 1.97822328e-06, 6.56121709e-08, 4.67076770e-05])
So basically, I am looking for a way to rewrite the function so that it can do this. Moreover, I would like to keep the function as a function of one variable only (i.e. only a function of x).
Thank you for your help!
Axes are defined for arrays with more than one dimension. A 2-dimensional array has two corresponding axes: the first running vertically downwards across rows (axis 0), and the second running horizontally across columns (axis 1). Many operation can take place along one of these axes.
The vectorized function evaluates pyfunc over successive tuples of the input arrays like the python map function, except it uses the broadcasting rules of numpy. The data type of the output of vectorized is determined by calling the function with the first element of the input.
You can use np.apply_along_axis
:
np.apply_along_axis(function, 1, array)
The first argument is the function, the second argument is the axis along which the function is to be applied. In your case, it is the first axis. The last argument is the array, of course.
You should be warned, however, that apply_along_axis
is only a convenience function, not a magic bullet. It has a severe speed limitation, since it just hides a loop. You should always try to vectorize your computation, where possible. Here's how I'd do this:
v = array[:, 0] ** 2 # computing just once return np.exp((-v / 200) - 0.5 * (array[:, 1] + 0.05 * v - 5) ** 2)
There are several ways to accomplish this, the only line you have to change is the asignment of x
and y
. x,y = vector
only works if the first dimension of vector
has length 2. (vector.shape = 2,...
). So you can simply change your vector with any of the following commands:
x,y = vector.T #transpose the array x,y = vector.swapaxes(0,1) #swap the axis 0 and 1 x,y = np.rollaxis(vector,1) #roll the axis 1 to the front x,y = vector[:,0], vector[:,1] #slice asignement
Just choose the one you like most, there might be other ways (I'm almost sure, but I guess this will suffice). The last one is by far the fastest, the others are comparable. The disatvantage of the last one however is, that it's not so easy to use it in higher dimensions.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With