I know there are some other ways to do the same thing, such as
ls -l | grep "^d"
or
ls -F | grep "/$"
I am just curious about the reason for adding "*/" after "ls -d". Why simply using "ls -d" not work? Is there any story or tricky stuff behind it?
Adding the -d
flag simply instructs ls
to simply list directory entries rather than their contents. The *
given to ls
is expanded to all the entries in the current directory, both files and dirs. So ls -d *
will list all entries in this directory, without expanding the subdirectories. But if you use */
, then bash expands this to only include the directories in this directory. But with just ls */
, all the directories will be expanded. Adding the -d
flag prevents that, and you get just the directories in this directory.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With