Anonymous class instance ---- is it a bad idea?

Question

In ES6 we can do anonymous class:

var entity = class { } 

But we can also instantiate it:

var entity = new class {     constructor(name) { this.name = name; }     getName() { return this.name; } }('Foo'); console.log(entity.getName()); // Foo 

What is done behind it, what advantage will it bring and what caveats will it also bring?

Answer 1

Anonymous class instance — is it a bad idea?

Yes, a very bad one. Just as bad as new function() { … } was in ES5.

This writing style leads to the creation of a new constructor function and prototype object every time the expression is evaluated. If you create multiple objects with this approach, they will get none of the benefits of classes/prototypes.

If you intended this pattern to create a singleton object, you failed as well. The constructor is still created, and it is even accessible - a second instance can be easily created using new entity.constructor, defeating the whole purpose.

So don't use it ever. A simple object literal is much easier to write, read and instantiate:

var entity = {     name: 'Foo',     getName() { return this.name; } }; console.log(entity.name); // Foo 

Don't be fooled by other languages where the new class pattern is common, it works very different there than in JavaScript.