I would like to do a request to my backend in a filter and return the result of my request. The problem is the service $http return a promise and it's the issue.
For present the issue I used a $timeout and the promises of angular in my fiddle : my fiddle
In my filter I use a $timeout with a promise but the final goal is to use a request http :
myApp.filter('filterHello', function ($http,$timeout,$q) {
return function (company_id) {
console.log("in the filter");
var deferred = $q.defer();
$timeout(function() {
deferred.resolve("ca marche");
}, 2000);
return deferred.promise;
};
});
Then in my view I use my filter who is suppose to display "ca marche" with a delay of 2 secondes but that doesn't work :
<div ng-controller="MyCtrl">
{{hello|filterHello}}
</div>
You can see that the filter return nothing and that there is an infinite loop in the filter because of the null promise I think.
If you don't understand why I want use a request http in a filter the answer is simple. For exemple I have an object user with the fields : email,name,company_id.. And I have an other object company with the fields : name, createOn,... I would like use the filter like this for display the name of the user's company :
{{user.company_id | ShowNameCompany}}
So, I need to do a request http in the filter to my company controller of my backend.
I hope someone can help me.
In AngularJS, you can also inject the $filter service within the controller and can use it with the following syntax for filter. Syntax: $filter("filter")(array, expression, compare, propertyKey) function myCtrl($scope, $filter) { $scope. finalResult = $filter("filter")( $scope.
Using filters in view templates Filters can be applied to the result of another filter. This is called "chaining" and uses the following syntax: {{ expression | filter1 | filter2 | ... }} E.g. the markup {{ 1234 | number:2 }} formats the number 1234 with 2 decimal points using the number filter.
$http is an AngularJS service for reading data from remote servers.
get request Method Syntax: $http. get(url, { params: { params1: values1, params2:values2, params3:values3...... } });
I think you should not use filters that way. Filters are for transforming inputs based on optional params.
The problem here would be that you're immediately returning a promise from the filter function. And that's nothing Angular can deal with as a result from a filter.
My suggestion therefore would be this - fetch the result first, work with the filter based on the result:
var app = angular.module("my.module");
app.controller("MyCtrl", ['$http', '$scope', function(http, scope) {
scope.hello = "foo";
http.get('http://my.service.com').then(function(data) {
scope.filterParams = data;
}, function(err) {
scope.filterParams = undefined;
});
}]);
app.filter("filterHello", function() {
return function(input, params) {
if(typeof params === "undefined") {
return "";
}
//work with the params here
};
});
and in the Template:
<div ng-controller="MyCtrl">
{{hello|filterHello:filterParams}}
</div>
Edit: Just read your explanation. To me, this would be a candidate for a directive:
app.directive("companyName", ['$http', function(http) {
return {
template: "<span>{{name}}</span>",
scope: {
companyId: "="
},
link: function(scope) {
http.get("http://my.service.com/companies/" + scope.id).then(function(result) {
scope.name = result.name;
}, function(err) {
scope.name = "unknown";
});
}
}
}]);
and in the template:
<span company-name company-id="user.company_id"></span>
If you have a lot of companies, you should preload the names (maybe send them with the first response initially?), as you'd be bombarding your server quite a bit with requests.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With