I have an abstract class called 'Template' defined as:
[DataContract]
public abstract class Template
{
[DataMember]
public virtual int? Id { get; set; }
[DataMember]
public virtual string Title { get; set; }
[DataMember]
public virtual byte[] TemplateDoc { get; set; }
[DataMember]
public virtual bool IsSystemTemplate { get; set; }
}
Two derived classes: UserTemplate and SystemTemplate implements above abstract class, which are defined as:
public class UserTemplate : Template
{
[DataMember]
public virtual Int32? OfficeId { get; set; }
[DataMember]
public virtual Int32? UserId { get; set; }
protected UserTemplate() { }
public UserTemplate(string title, byte[] templateDoc, string templateDocName, TemplateType templateType, int officeId, int? userId)
{
this.Title = title;
this.TemplateDoc = templateDoc;
this.IsSystemTemplate = false;
this.OfficeId = officeId;
this.UserId = userId;
}
}
public class SystemTemplate : Template
{
[DataMember]
public virtual Int32? MultiListGroupId { get; set; }
protected SystemTemplate() { }
public SystemTemplate(string title, byte[] templateDoc, string templateDocName, TemplateType templateType, int multiListGroupId)
{
this.Title = title;
this.TemplateDoc = templateDoc;
this.IsSystemTemplate = true;
this.MultiListGroupId = multiListGroupId;
}
}
Now, when I try to call following service method:
List<Template> GetTemplatesByTemplateType(int officeId, int? userId, TemplateType templateType)
I get this error:
System.Net.Sockets.SocketException: An existing connection was forcibly closed by the remote host
Is it because of the reason that I am trying to return an abstract class?
It runs fine if I try to call this method using unit test.
Yes, the problem is your abstract base class which needs to be decorated with the KnownType and XmlInclude attributes. See here: http://geekswithblogs.net/ugandadotnet/archive/2008/05/27/serializing-an-abstract-data-contract.aspx
In addition to grenade's answer about making those descendant classes known to WCF usign the KnownType
(or ServiceKnownType
) attribute, you'll also have to decorate the descendant classes with a [DataContract]
attribute themselves.
[DataContract]
public class UserTemplate : Template
{
......
}
[DataContract]
public class SystemTemplate : Template
{
......
}
These attributes are almost never inherited from parent to child in WCF - you need to be very explicit and clear about your intent at every level.
Check this blog post All About KnownTypes for more information on the KnownTypes and ServiceKnownTypes attributes.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With