I'm trying to create a simple date class, but I get an error on my main file that says, "call of overloaded Date() is ambiguous." I'm not sure why since I thought as long as I had different parameters for my constructor, I was ok. Here is my code:
header file:
#ifndef DATE_H
#define DATE_H
using std::string;
class Date
{
public:
static const int monthsPerYear = 12; // num of months in a yr
Date(int = 1, int = 1, int = 1900); // default constructor
Date(); // uses system time to create object
void print() const; // print date in month/day/year format
~Date(); // provided to confirm destruction order
string getMonth(int month) const; // gets month in text format
private:
int month; // 1 - 12
int day; // 1 - 31
int year; // any year
int checkDay(int) const;
};
#endif
.cpp file
#include <iostream>
#include <iomanip>
#include <string>
#include <ctime>
#include "Date.h"
using namespace std;
Date::Date()
{
time_t seconds = time(NULL);
struct tm* t = localtime(&seconds);
month = t->tm_mon;
day = t->tm_mday;
year = t->tm_year;
}
Date::Date(int mn, int dy, int yr)
{
if (mn > 0 && mn <= monthsPerYear)
month = mn;
else
{
month = 1; // invalid month set to 1
cout << "Invalid month (" << mn << ") set to 1.\n";
}
year = yr; // could validate yr
day = checkDay(dy); // validate the day
// output Date object to show when its constructor is called
cout << "Date object constructor for date ";
print();
cout << endl;
}
void Date::print() const
{
string str;
cout << month << '/' << day << '/' << year << '\n';
// new code for HW2
cout << setfill('0') << setw(3) << day; // prints in ddd
cout << " " << year << '\n'; // yyyy format
str = getMonth(month);
// prints in month (full word), day, year
cout << str << " " << day << ", " << year << '\n';
}
and my main.cpp
#include <iostream>
#include "Date.h"
using std::cout;
int main()
{
Date date1(4, 30, 1980);
date1.print();
cout << '\n';
Date date2;
date2.print();
}
This means that you have two constructors with the same signature, or that you're trying to create a new instance of Case with parameters that could match more than one constructor. In your case : Case(Problem, Solution, double, CaseSource) Java create methods (constructors) signatures with the parameter types.
ambiguous means the compiler found multiple “valid” choices and refused to make the choice for you. You need to add clarifying information (usually about types). It may be that the compiler is able to convert a value into a type that matches a constructor and can do this twice.
When you derive classes, ambiguities can result if base and derived classes have members with the same names. Access to a base class member is ambiguous if you use a name or qualified name that does not refer to a unique function or object.
Date(int = 1, int = 1, int = 1900); // default constructor
Date(); // uses system time to create object
These are both callable with no parameters. It can't be default constructed, because it's ambiguous how to construct the object.
Honestly, having those three with default parameters doesn't make much sense. When would I specify one but not the others?
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With