2.9999999999999999 >> .5?

Question

I heard that you could right-shift a number by .5 instead of using Math.floor(). I decided to check its limits to make sure that it was a suitable replacement, so I checked the following values and got the following results in Google Chrome:

2.5 >> .5 == 2;
2.9999 >> .5 == 2;
2.999999999999999 >> .5 == 2;  // 15 9s
2.9999999999999999 >> .5 == 3;  // 16 9s

After some fiddling, I found out that the highest possible value of two which, when right-shifted by .5, would yield 2 is 2.9999999999999997779553950749686919152736663818359374999999¯ (with the 9 repeating) in Chrome and Firefox. The number is 2.9999999999999997779¯ in IE.

My question is: what is the significance of the number .0000000000000007779553950749686919152736663818359374? It's a very strange number and it really piqued my curiosity.

I've been trying to find an answer or at least some kind of pattern, but I think my problem lies in the fact that I really don't understand the bitwise operation. I understand the idea in principle, but shifting a bit sequence by .5 doesn't make any sense at all to me. Any help is appreciated.

For the record, the weird digit sequence changes with 2^x. The highest possible values of the following numbers that still truncate properly:

for 0: 0.9999999999999999444888487687421729788184165954589843749¯
for 1: 1.9999999999999999888977697537484345957636833190917968749¯
for 2-3: x+.99999999999999977795539507496869191527366638183593749¯
for 4-7: x+.9999999999999995559107901499373838305473327636718749¯
for 8-15: x+.999999999999999111821580299874767661094665527343749¯
...and so forth

Answer 1

Actually, you're simply ending up doing a floor() on the first operand, without any floating point operations going on. Since the left shift and right shift bitwise operations only make sense with integer operands, the JavaScript engine is converting the two operands to integers first:

2.999999 >> 0.5

Becomes:

Math.floor(2.999999) >> Math.floor(0.5)

Which in turn is:

2 >> 0

Shifting by 0 bits means "don't do a shift" and therefore you end up with the first operand, simply truncated to an integer.

The SpiderMonkey source code has:

switch (op) {
  case JSOP_LSH:
  case JSOP_RSH:
    if (!js_DoubleToECMAInt32(cx, d, &i)) // Same as Math.floor()
        return JS_FALSE;
    if (!js_DoubleToECMAInt32(cx, d2, &j)) // Same as Math.floor()
        return JS_FALSE;
    j &= 31;
    d = (op == JSOP_LSH) ? i << j : i >> j;
    break;

Your seeing a "rounding up" with certain numbers is due to the fact the JavaScript engine can't handle decimal digits beyond a certain precision and therefore your number ends up getting rounded up to the next integer. Try this in your browser:

alert(2.999999999999999);

You'll get 2.999999999999999. Now try adding one more 9:

alert(2.9999999999999999);

You'll get a 3.

Answer 2

This is possibly the single worst idea I have ever seen. Its only possible purpose for existing is for winning an obfusticated code contest. There's no significance to the long numbers you posted -- they're an artifact of the underlying floating-point implementation, filtered through god-knows how many intermediate layers. Bit-shifting by a fractional number of bytes is insane and I'm surprised it doesn't raise an exception -- but that's Javascript, always willing to redefine "insane".

If I were you, I'd avoid ever using this "feature". Its only value is as a possible root cause for an unusual error condition. Use Math.floor() and take pity on the next programmer who will maintain the code.

---

Confirming a couple suspicions I had when reading the question:

• Right-shifting any fractional number x by any fractional number y will simply truncate x, giving the same result as Math.floor() while thoroughly confusing the reader.
• 2.999999999999999777955395074968691915... is simply the largest number that can be differentiated from "3". Try evaluating it by itself -- if you add anything to it, it will evaluate to 3. This is an artifact of the browser and local system's floating-point implementation.