I'm using xstream to process an xml string but some fields of the object have changed between versions, so i'm implementing a custom converter. A summary of the field changes is listed below, and only the first two field types are different.
Field type1 type2
a short String
b String Object
c List List
d Object Object
.
.
.
x String String
My current converter is implemented to handle each of the fields specifically, which leads to a large number of 'else if' conditions within the unmarshal() method
package a.b.c.reports;
import com.thoughtworks.xstream.converters.Converter;
import com.thoughtworks.xstream.converters.MarshallingContext;
import com.thoughtworks.xstream.converters.UnmarshallingContext;
import com.thoughtworks.xstream.io.HierarchicalStreamReader;
import com.thoughtworks.xstream.io.HierarchicalStreamWriter;
public class MyConverter implements Converter {
..
@Override
public Object unmarshal(HierarchicalStreamReader reader,UnmarshallingContext context) {
while (reader.hasMoreChildren()) {
reader.moveDown();
if(reader.getNodeName().equals("a"))
{
a = reader.getValue();
}
else if (reader.getNodeName().equals("b"))
{
b = (Object) context.convertAnother(reader, Object.class);
}
else if(reader.getNodeName().equals("c"))
{
a = reader.getValue();
}
..
..
}
}
Is there a smarter way to delegate the processing of fields who's types have not changed to the default xstream converter?
The question is a bit stale, but nevertheless took me some time to gather the bits.
Simple solution to that is to extend the ReflectionConverter
instead of implementing the raw Converter
interface. ReflectionConverter
is the default converter in the XStream so override what's needed and super
everything else. Then new XStream().register
your new converter and you're good.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With