I'm looking for a way to have a collection of homogeneous objects, wrap them in another object, but have the wrapper object have the same API as the original and forward the corresponding API call to its object members.
class OriginalApi:
def __init__(self):
self.a = 1
self.b = "bee"
def do_something(self, new_a, new_b, put_them_together=None):
self.a = new_a or self.a
self.b = new_b or self.b
if put_them_together is not None:
self.b = "{}{}".format(self.a, self.b)
# etc.
class WrappedApi:
def __init__(self):
self.example_1 = OriginalApi()
self.example_2 = OriginalApi()
Some possible solutions that have been considered, but are inadequate:
Rewriting the whole API Why not? Not adequate because the API is fairly large and expanding. Having to maintain the API in multiple spots is not realistic.
Code example:
class WrappedApi:
def __init__(self):
self.example_1 = OriginalApi()
self.example_2 = OriginalApi()
def do_something(self, new_a, new_b, put_them_together=None):
self.example_1.do_something(new_a, new_b, put_them_together)
self.example_2.do_something(new_a, new_b, put_them_together)
Using a list and a for-loop This changes the API on the object. That said, this is the backup solution in the event I can't find something more elegant. In this case, the WrappedApi
class would not exist.
Code example:
wrapped_apis = [OriginalApi(), OriginalApi()]
for wrapped_api in wrapped_apis:
wrapped_api.do_something(1, 2, True)
I tried using Python Object Wrapper, but I could not see how to have it call multiple sub-objects with the same arguments.
And for anyone curious about the use case, it's actually a collection of several matplotlib axes
objects. I don't want to reimplement to entire axes
API (it's big), and I don't want to change all the code that makes calls on axes (like plot
, step
, etc.)
If you're only implementing methods then a generic __getattr__
can do the trick
class Wrapper:
def __init__(self, x):
self.x = x
def __getattr__(self, name):
def f(*args, **kwargs):
for y in self.x:
getattr(y, name)(*args, **kwargs)
return f
For example with x = Wrapper([[], [], []])
after calling x.append(12)
all the three list objects will have 12 as last element.
Note that the return value will always be None
... an option could be collecting return values and returning them as a list but this of course would "break the API".
I think you have the right idea here
wrapped_apis = [OriginalApi(), OriginalApi()]
for wrapped_api in wrapped_apis:
wrapped_api.do_something(1, 2, True)
You can define your wrapper class by inheriting from list
and then handle the API calls to its items once it is created.
class WrapperClass(list):
def __init__(self, api_type):
self.api_type = api_type
for func in dir(api_type):
if callable(getattr(api_type, func)) and not func.startswith("__"):
setattr(self, func, lambda *args, **kwargs:
[getattr(o, func)(*args, **kwargs) for o in self])
w = WrapperClass(OriginalApi)
o1, o2 = [OriginalApi()]*2
w.append(o1)
w.append(o2)
print(w.do_something(1, 2, True))
# [None, None]
print(w[0].b)
# 12
print(w[1].b)
# 12
print(o1.b)
# 12
Here, I'm iterating every method in your API class and creating a method in the wrapper class that applies its arguments to all its list items. It then returns a list comprehension consisting of the results.
Needless to say, you should probably validate the type of a new object being appended to this WrapperClass
like so,
def append(self, item):
if not isinstance(item, self.api_type):
raise TypeError('Wrong API type. Expected %s'.format(self.api_type))
super(WrapperClass, self).append(item)
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With