I desperately need to find a solution for the following problem:
namespace test
{
template <int param = 0> struct Flags
{
int _flags;
Flags()
{
_flags = 0;
}
Flags(int flags)
{
_flags = flags;
}
void init()
{
}
};
union example
{
struct
{
union
{
struct
{
Flags<4096> f;
}p1; //error: member 'test::example::<anonymous struct>::<anonymous union>::<anonymous struct> test::example::<anonymous struct>::<anonymous union>::p1' with constructor not allowed in union
struct
{
Flags<16384> ff;
}p2; //error: member 'test::example::<anonymous struct>::<anonymous union>::<anonymous struct> test::example::<anonymous struct>::<anonymous union>::p2' with constructor not allowed in union
}parts;
byte bytes[8];
}data;
int data1;
int data2;
}
}
It's frustrating that if I add tags to p1 and p2 structs, the code will compile, but the f & ff members would not be accessible:
...
struct p1
{
Flags<4096> f;
};
struct p2
{
Flags<4096> ff;
};
...
void test()
{
example ex;
ex.data.bytes[0] = 0; //Ok
ex.data.parts.p1.f.init(); //error: invalid use of 'struct test::example::<anonymous struct>::<anonymous union>::p1'
}
Is there any way to make this work somehow?
As @Als said, union cannot define non-POD as member data, there is one alternative. You can still define a pointer to the non-POD as member data of the union.
So this is allowed:
union
{
struct
{
Flags<4096> *pf; //pointer to non-POD
}p1;
struct
{
Flags<16384> *pff; //pointer to non-POD
}p2;
}parts;
But then Boost.Variant is a better alternative.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With