Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

With assignment expressions in Python 3.8, why do we need to use `as` in `with`?

Now that PEP 572 has been accepted, Python 3.8 is destined to have assignment expressions, so we can use an assignment expression in with, i.e.

with (f := open('file.txt')):     for l in f:         print(f) 

instead of

with open('file.txt') as f:     for l in f:         print(f) 

and it would work as before.

What use does the as keyword have with the with statement in Python 3.8? Isn't this against the Zen of Python: "There should be one -- and preferably only one -- obvious way to do it."?


When the feature was originally proposed, it wasn't clearly specified whether the assignment expression should be parenthesized in with and that

with f := open('file.txt'):     for l in f:         print(f) 

could work. However, in Python 3.8a0,

with f := open('file.txt'):     for l in f:         print(f) 

will cause

  File "<stdin>", line 1     with f := open('file.txt'):            ^ SyntaxError: invalid syntax 

but the parenthesized expression works.

like image 948

People also ask

Why can't I use an assignment in an expression in Python?

The error is a simple typo: x = 0, which assigns 0 to the variable x, was written while the comparison x == 0 is certainly what was intended.

What is assignment expression in Python?

Assignment expression are written with a new notation (:=) . This operator is often called the walrus operator as it resembles the eyes and tusks of a walrus on its side. Assignment expressions allow you to assign and return a value in the same expression.

How do you assign an expression to a variable in Python?

Python 3.8, released in October 2019, adds assignment expressions to Python via the := syntax. The assignment expression syntax is also sometimes called “the walrus operator” because := vaguely resembles a walrus with tusks. Assignment expressions allow variable assignments to occur inside of larger expressions.


1 Answers

TL;DR: The behaviour is not the same for both constructs, even though there wouldn't be discernible differences between the 2 examples.

You should almost never need := in a with statement, and sometimes it is very wrong. When in doubt, always use with ... as ... when you need the managed object within the with block.


In with context_manager as managed, managed is bound to the return value of context_manager.__enter__(), whereas in with (managed := context_manager), managed is bound to the context_manager itself and the return value of the __enter__() method call is discarded. The behaviour is almost identical for open files, because their __enter__ method returns self.

The first excerpt is roughly analogous to

_mgr = (f := open('file.txt')) # `f` is assigned here, even if `__enter__` fails _mgr.__enter__()               # the return value is discarded  exc = True try:     try:         BLOCK     except:         # The exceptional case is handled here         exc = False         if not _mgr.__exit__(*sys.exc_info()):             raise         # The exception is swallowed if exit() returns true finally:     # The normal and non-local-goto cases are handled here     if exc:         _mgr.__exit__(None, None, None) 

whereas the as form would be

_mgr = open('file.txt')   #  _value = _mgr.__enter__() # the return value is kept  exc = True try:     try:         f = _value        # here f is bound to the return value of __enter__                           # and therefore only when __enter__ succeeded         BLOCK     except:         # The exceptional case is handled here         exc = False         if not _mgr.__exit__(*sys.exc_info()):             raise         # The exception is swallowed if exit() returns true finally:     # The normal and non-local-goto cases are handled here     if exc:         _mgr.__exit__(None, None, None) 

i.e. with (f := open(...)) would set f to the return value of open, whereas with open(...) as f binds f to the return value of the implicit __enter__() method call.

Now, in case of files and streams, file.__enter__() will return self if it succeeds, so the behaviour for these two approaches is almost the same - the only difference is in the event that __enter__ throws an exception.

The fact that assignment expressions will often work instead of as is deceptive, because there are many classes where _mgr.__enter__() returns an object that is distinct from self. In that case an assignment expression works differently: the context manager is assigned, instead of the managed object. For example unittest.mock.patch is a context manager that will return the mock object. The documentation for it has the following example:

>>> thing = object() >>> with patch('__main__.thing', new_callable=NonCallableMock) as mock_thing: ...     assert thing is mock_thing ...     thing() ... Traceback (most recent call last):   ... TypeError: 'NonCallableMock' object is not callable 

Now, if it were to be written to use an assignment expression, the behaviour would be different:

>>> thing = object() >>> with (mock_thing := patch('__main__.thing', new_callable=NonCallableMock)): ...     assert thing is mock_thing ...     thing() ... Traceback (most recent call last):   ... AssertionError >>> thing <object object at 0x7f4aeb1ab1a0> >>> mock_thing <unittest.mock._patch object at 0x7f4ae910eeb8> 

mock_thing is now bound to the context manager instead of the new mock object.