Possible Duplicate:
Will new return NULL in any case?
Say i have a class Car and i create an object
Car *newcar = new Car();
if(newcar==NULL) //is it valid to check for NULL if new runs out of memory
{
}
Operator new returns a pointer to a beginning of an array. Pointer is the address of some cell in memory. that's why we can say: Operator new returns a address to a beginning of an array.
If the new operator fails to allocate memory it returns NULL which can be used to detect failure or success of new operator.
Answer: When we allocate memory from heap dynamically in a C++ program using new operator, the program crashes when memory is not available, or the system is not able to allocate memory to a program, as it throws an exception. So, to prevent program crash, we need to handle the exception when memory allocation fails.
On a standards-conforming C++ implementation, no. The ordinary form of new
will never return NULL
; if allocation fails, a std::bad_alloc
exception will be thrown (the new (nothrow)
form does not throw exceptions, and will return NULL
if allocation fails).
On some older C++ compilers (especially those that were released before the language was standardized) or in situations where exceptions are explicitly disabled (for example, perhaps some compilers for embedded systems), new
may return NULL
on failure. Compilers that do this do not conform to the C++ standard.
No, new
throws std::bad_alloc
on allocation failure. Use new(std::nothrow) Car
instead if you don't want exceptions.
By default C++ throws a std::bad_alloc exception when the new operator fails. Therefore the check for NULL is not needed unless you explicitly disabled exception usage.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With