class a {
function __get($property){...}
}
$obj = new a();
var_dump(isset($obj->newproperty));
Seems the answer is nope but why?
Because it checks __isset rather than retrieving it using __get.
It is a much better option to call __isset, as there is no standard on what is empty. Maybe in the context of the class null is an acceptable value. You could also have a class that if the member didn't exist, it returned a new empty object, which would break isset($myObj->item)
as in that case it would always return true.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With