Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

Why won't control update/refresh mid-process

I have a windows form (C#.NET) with a statusLabel that I can not seem to get to update in the middle of a process in event handler methods. My code looks like this...

    void Process_Completed(object sender, EventArgs e)
    {

        string t = "Process is finished!";
        this.Invoke(new StatusLabelUpdator(updateStatusLabel), new object[] { t });
    }

    void Process_Started(object sender, EventArgs e)
    {
        string t = "Process has begun";
        this.Invoke(new StatusLabelUpdator(updateStatusLabel), new object[] { t });
    }

    private delegate void StatusLabelUpdator(string text);
    private void updateStatusLabel(string text)
    {
        StatusLabel1.Text = text;
        statusStrip1.Invalidate();
        statusStrip1.Refresh();
        statusStrip1.Update();
    }

When I run the code, once the process starts, the Process_Started method is triggered, and a couple seconds later the Process_Completed method is triggered. For some reason I can not get the status label to ever display "Process has begun". It only ever displays "Process is finished!". As you can see I have tried invalidating, refreshing and updating the status strip which contains the status label but no success. I can't call update/refresh/invalidate on the statuslabel itself because those methods are not available to it. What am I doing wrong?

ADDED INFO:

The "process" is started by a button click on the form which calls a method in a separate class that looks like this:

public void DoSomeProcess()
{
    TriggerProcessStarted();
    System.Threading.Thread.Sleep(2000);   // For testing..
    TriggerProcessComplete();
}

and inside the TriggerProcessxxxx methods I trigger the events using this code...

var EventListeners = EH.GetInvocationList();    //EH is the appropriate EventHandler
if (EventListeners != null)
{
    for (int index = 0; index < EventListeners.Count(); index++)
    {
        var methodToInvoke = (EventHandler)EventListeners[index];
        methodToInvoke.BeginInvoke(this, EventArgs.Empty, EndAsyncEvent, new object[] { });
    }
}

Finally, I have added Application.DoEvents() to the updateStatusLabel method but it did not help. I am still getting the same result. Here is my update method.

private void updateStatusLabel(string text)
{
    StatusLabel1.Text = text;
    statusStrip1.Refresh();
    Application.DoEvents(); 
}

So I guess the "processing" is taking place on the UI thread but eventhandler is invoked on it's own thread which then invokes the control update back on the UI thread. Is this a dumb way of doing things? Note: The class that contains the DoSomeProcess() method is in a separate .NET ClassLibrary that i am referencing.

like image 238
PICyourBrain Avatar asked Feb 26 '10 13:02

PICyourBrain


People also ask

Why is my Windows update taking so long?

Why do updates take so long to install? Windows 10 updates take a while to complete because Microsoft is constantly adding larger files and features to them. The biggest updates, released in the spring and fall of every year, take upwards of four hours to install — if there are no problems.

How do I know if my Windows update is stuck?

You can tell if Windows updates are stuck if nothing happens on screen for 3 hours or more. If there's any wonder after that long, take a look at your hard drive activity light. You'll see either no activity at all (stuck) or very regular but very short flashes of light (not stuck).


1 Answers

If you're doing your processing on the UI thread, it won't be able to do anything else (like redraw updated labels) while the processing is running. So for instance, if the processing is happening because the user clicked a button and is triggered by the button click handler (without explicitly placing it on another thread), it's running on the UI thread. Even though you update the label's text, it doesn't get drawn until it receives a paint message, at which point it's probably busy doing your processing.

The answer is to do long-running processing on a separate thread. The hack (IMHO) is to use Application.DoEvents to let the UI thread do some UI stuff during your processing. If you put one of those after updating the label and before you start your processing, odds are pretty high the label will get repainted. But then, during the processing, no further paint events can get processed (leading to half-drawn windows when someone moves another app window over your app and back, etc.). Hence my calling it a hack (even though, er, um, I've been known to do it :-) ).

Edit Update based on your edits:

Re

So I guess the "processing" is taking place on the UI thread but eventhandler is invoked on it's own thread...

I'm assuming DoSomeProcess is triggered from the UI thread (e.g., in direct response to a button click or similar). If so, then yes, your processing is definitely on the UI thread. Because TriggerProcessStarted triggers your callback asynchronously via BeginInvoke, you have no idea when it will run, but in any case your code then immediately launches into processing, never yielding, so no one else is going to be able to grab that thread. Since that's the UI thread, the call to the delegate will block on the Invoke call setting the label's text, whereupon it has to wait for the UI thread (which is busy processing). (And that's assuming it's scheduled on a different thread; I couldn't 100% convince myself either way, because Microsoft has two different BeginInvokes -- which IIRC one of the designers has acknowledged was a Really Dumb Idea -- and it's been a while since I fought with this stuff.)

If you make the TriggerProcessStarted calls to your callbacks synchronous, you should be okay. But ideally, schedule the processing (if it's not doing UI) on its own thread instead.

like image 91
T.J. Crowder Avatar answered Oct 16 '22 08:10

T.J. Crowder