Let's assume for a moment that you must create a JavaScript link that doesn't have a meaningful href
. (I know that this practice is questionable.) In this case, why do so many people use...
<a href="javascript:void(0);"> My link </a>
Knowing that void(0)
evaluates to undefined
, can I simply use the following logic?
<a href="javascript:undefined;"> My link </a>
Why people use void(x)
instead of undefined
?
Well both would work but undefined
is a reserved variable and its value can be changed:
undefined = true;
This will give true instead of undefined.
Where as void()
is a keyword which always returns undefined. Whatever you place inside the keyword:
void('return false plox'); //will return false
More info on this topic here: What does `void 0` mean?
Note that <a href="#">
is not the same as it still acts as a link and will redirect you, where as the previous methods will cancel the event(similar to event.preventDefault
).
Update
Since ECMAScript 5, the global undefined
variable is no longer directly editable (See for example Mozilla docs). It now simply shadows the global variable as some have noted.
There are three differences,
void
evaluates the given expression and then returns the undefined
window.undefined
is writable whereas void
operator will always return undefined
void
has fewer characters and results in smaller code, if you are using lot of themAlso, if you are using void
to return undefined
then you can simply use void 0
, which is equivalent to void(0)
.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With