Why shouldn't I use PHP's mail() function?

Question

The general opinion when it comes to sending email messages in PHP is to stay clear of PHP's built-in mail() function and to use a library instead.

What I want to know are the actual reasons and flaws in using mail() over a library or extension. For example, the commonly specified headers that aren't included in a standard mail() call.

Answer 1

Quoting:

Disadvantages of the PHP mail() function

In some cases, mails send via PHP mail() did not receive the recipients although it was send by WB without any error message. The most common reasons for that issue are listed below.

• wrong format of mail header or content (e.g. differences in line break between Windows/Unix)
• sendmail not installed or configured on your server (php.ini)
• the mail provider of the recipeint does not allow mails send by PHP mail(); common spam protection

Errors in the format of header or content can cause that mails are treated as SPAM. In the best case, such mails are transfered to the spam folder of your recipient inbox or send back to the sender. In the worst case, such mails are deleted without any comment. If sendmail is not installed or not configured, no mails can be send at all.

It is common practice by free mail provider such as GMX, to reject mails send via the PHP function mail(). Very often such mails are deleted without any information of the recipient.

Answer 2

PHP's mail() is said to garble headers and runs slowly. I can't say this from personal experience because I've never used it, because, like you, I've always been advised against it. If you look at the comments on the entry for mail() in the PHP manual, you can see some of the problems people have with it (esp. with headers).

It's definitely not suited for sending any substantial amount of email, because, according to the manual itself,

It is worth noting that the mail() function is not suitable for larger volumes of email in a loop. This function opens and closes an SMTP socket for each email, which is not very efficient.

For the sending of large amounts of email, see the » PEAR::Mail, and » PEAR::Mail_Queue packages.

AFAIK, it's never preferable (performance-wise) to open and close a socket for each message you send regardless of the amount of mail you're sending.

Basically, it's a function that works, but not very well, and is eclipsed by a number of better libraries.