Possible Duplicate:
Why is lock(this) {…} bad?
In C# to make a critical region thread safe we can use lock()
statement. The lock statement takes an object. What is wrong if we pass this
to the lock statement?
Locks are used to guard a shared data variable, like the account balance shown here. If all accesses to a data variable are guarded (surrounded by a synchronized block) by the same lock object, then those accesses will be guaranteed to be atomic — uninterrupted by other threads.
The lock statement acquires the mutual-exclusion lock for a given object, executes a statement block, and then releases the lock. While a lock is held, the thread that holds the lock can again acquire and release the lock. Any other thread is blocked from acquiring the lock and waits until the lock is released.
A lock may be a tool for controlling access to a shared resource by multiple threads. Commonly, a lock provides exclusive access to a shared resource: just one thread at a time can acquire the lock and everyone accesses to the shared resource requires that the lock be acquired first.
Typically, threads cannot acquire locks twice in a row: a thread must release an acquired lock before attempting to acquire it again. However, reentrant locks can be acquired multiple times by the same thread. Reentrant locks allow code to acquire a lock before calling other functions that acquire the same lock.
Because this
is not encapsulated by the class and thus it is hard to reason about who locks on this. I.e. in order to find out what part of the code is locking on this
you need to go through a lot. If, on the other hand, you restrict locking to a private member, it is easy to reason about where locking takes place.
From http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/c5kehkcz.aspx:
In general, avoid locking on a public type, or instances beyond your code's control. The common constructs
lock (this)
,lock (typeof (MyType))
, andlock ("myLock")
violate this guideline:
lock (this)
is a problem if the instance can be accessed publicly.lock (typeof (MyType))
is a problem ifMyType
is publicly accessible.lock(“myLock”)
is a problem because any other code in the process using the same string, will share the same lock.Best practice is to define a private object to lock on, or a private static object variable to protect data common to all instances.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With