Why should default parameters be added last in C++ functions?
To simplify the language definition and keep code readable.
void foo(int x = 2, int y);
To call that and take advantage of the default value, you'd need syntax like this:
foo(, 3);
Which was probably felt to be too weird. Another alternative is specifying names in the argument list:
foo(y : 3);
A new symbol would have to be used because this already means something:
foo(y = 3); // assign 3 to y and then pass y to foo.
The naming approach was considered and rejected by the ISO committee because they were uncomfortable with introducing a new significance to parameter names outside of the function definition.
If you're interested in more C++ design rationales, read The Design and Evolution of C++ by Stroustrup.
If you define the following function:
void foo( int a, int b = 0, int c );
How would you call the function and supply a value for a and c, but leave b as the default?
foo( 10, ??, 5 );
Unlike some other languages (eg, Python), function arguments in C/C++ can not be qualified by name, like the following:
foo( a = 10, c = 5 );
If that were possible, then the default arguments could be anywhere in the list.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With