Though I do not dislike it, but find it inconvinient to declare a pair<X,Y>
object, or make a call to make_pair
, in order to call map::insert
. Why insert
doesn't take two arguments instead to specify Key and Value respectively.
While I understand it is for compatibility with other STL containers, that exhibit value_type
. But find
method takes key_type
which breaks this compatibility assertion. map
has both key_type
and mapped_type
, so why cant map
have:
iterator insert(const key_type&, const mapped_type&);
Yes, there are overloads of insert
taking iterator(s). But this two-argument insert
could have been mixed well.
Just one advantage I see is: less call stack usage.
EDIT:
Just found out that insert
is the only method that takes value_type
, that is pair<X,Y>
. Many other methods like find
, erase
, at
, count
, equal_range
, lower_bound
, upper_bound
and operator[]
take key_type
.
map insert() in C++ STL. The map::insert() is a built-in function in C++ STL which is used to insert elements with a particular key in the map container. Parameters: The function accepts a pair that consists of a key and element which is to be inserted into the map container.
Do you mean cout << mymap[make_pair(1,2)] << endl; ? (1,2) is non-sensical, at least in this context. You must have an std::pair to be used as your key, and that means following what @andre just commented. Yes!
A pair is a single unit with two members. A map has keys and values in it. So you can use pairs to fill up a map, the elements of the pair becoming key and value.
A C++ map is a way to store a key-value pair. A map can be declared as follows: #include <iostream> #include <map> map<int, int> sample_map; Each map entry consists of a pair: a key and a value.
insert (pair): This function inserts the pair in the map. The insertion only takes place when the key passed is not already inset. It returns a pointer pair. First element pointing to the pair already present or newly inserted.
insert (pair) : This function inserts the pair in map. The insertion only takes place when the key passed is not already in set. It returns a pointer pair. First element pointing to the pair already present or newly inserted.
Using insert (): Insert function is used to insert the key-value pair in the map. After insertion, the reordering of elements takes place and the map is sorted w.r.t the key. This function is implemented in 3 ways: insert (pair): This function inserts the pair in the map. The insertion only takes place when the key passed is not already inset.
This function is implemented in 3 ways: insert (pair): This function inserts the pair in the map. The insertion only takes place when the key passed is not already inset. It returns a pointer pair. First element pointing to the pair already present or newly inserted. Second element returning the boolean status “true” or “false”.
All standard library containers define a value_type
member type, and their interfaces generically operate in terms of this value_type
: insert
, push_back
, push_front
. The new interface emplace
adds a way of constructing a value_type
object as if by:
value_type(std::forward<Args>(args)...)
Basically, there is no special interface provided for the satellite-data associative containers (i.e. maps) which is aware of the special structure of value_type
(which is defined, not perfectly well-known, to bepair<const key_type, mapped_type>
), with the exception of find
and erase
and operator[]
, which take key_type
arguments.
It is perhaps an oversight of the standard, or perhaps it was never deemed to be a problem, since you can always use make_pair
, make_tuple
or forward_as_tuple
, or emplace
, to create map value types.
(There is one problem with insert
and move-only mapped types that has surfaced and is subject of this recent proposal.)
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With