Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

Why Java opens 3 ports when JMX is configured?

Tags:

java

jmx

rmi

I run my Java program with JDK7 on Centos6. I enable JMX using the following options:

JAVA_OPTS="${JAVA_OPTS} -Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote -Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.port=9123 -Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.ssl=false -Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.authenticate=false -Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.local.only=true" 

When I check what ports are opened I discover 2 additional random ports:

netstat -plunt | grep java tcp        0      0 :::9123                     :::*                        LISTEN      13295/java tcp        0      0 :::59927                    :::*                        LISTEN      13295/java tcp        0      0 :::59928                    :::*                        LISTEN      13295/java 

Please note that each restart only configured port 9123 remains same, and two additional ports change values.

netstat -plunt | grep java tcp        0      0 :::9123                     :::*                        LISTEN      13331/java tcp        0      0 :::59932                    :::*                        LISTEN      13331/java tcp        0      0 :::59933                    :::*                        LISTEN      13331/java 

What are 2 additional ports and why they are opened?

How can I configure 2 additional random ports?

How can I configure ::ffff:127.0.0.1 will appear before all ports opened by JMX?

Why one port is not used when connecting with JConsole?

Added to clarify the answer

Unfortunately, the additional random port is still opened To remind you, I use Centos 6. My Tomcat settings are look like this (Tomcat does not deploy any applications):

CATALINA_OPTS="${CATALINA_OPTS}  -XX:+DisableAttachMechanism -Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote -Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.ssl=false -Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.authenticate=false -Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.local.only=true -Djava.rmi.server.useLocalHostname=true -Djava.rmi.server.useCodebaseOnly=true -Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.port=9123 -Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.rmi.port=9123" 

Tomcat process looks like this:

/usr/java/jdk1.7.0_51/bin/java -Djava.util.logging.config.file=/usr/tomcat-7.0.47/conf/logging.properties -Djava.util.logging.manager=org.apache.juli.ClassLoaderLogManager -XX:+DisableAttachMechanism -Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote -Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.ssl=false -Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.authenticate=false -Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.local.only=true -Djava.rmi.server.useLocalHostname=true -Djava.rmi.server.useCodebaseOnly=true -Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.port=9123 -Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.rmi.port=9123 -Djava.endorsed.dirs=/usr/tomcat-7.0.47/endorsed -classpath /usr/tomcat-7.0.47/bin/bootstrap.jar:/usr/tomcat-7.0.47/bin/tomcat-juli.jar -Dcatalina.base=/usr/tomcat-7.0.47 -Dcatalina.home=/usr/tomcat-7.0.47 -Djava.io.tmpdir=/usr/tomcat-7.0.47/temp org.apache.catalina.startup.Bootstrap start 

Unfortunately, each time I see additional listening port:

tcp        0      0 :::38830                    :::*                        LISTEN      790/java tcp        0      0 ::ffff:127.0.0.1:8080       :::*                        LISTEN      790/java tcp        0      0 :::9123                     :::*                        LISTEN      790/java 

Additional run:

tcp        0      0 ::ffff:127.0.0.1:8080       :::*                        LISTEN      2348/java tcp        0      0 :::36252                    :::*                        LISTEN      2348/java tcp        0      0 :::9123                     :::*                        LISTEN      2348/java 

BTW, why I can not see ::ffff:127.0.0.1 before RMI ports?

Added second time to clarify the comment

It is not related to Tomcat. I have tried to run ant with similar settings: Ant process looks like this:

/usr/bin/java -XX:+DisableAttachMechanism -Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote -Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.ssl=false -Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.authenticate=false -Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.local.only=true -Djava.rmi.server.useLocalHostname=true -Djava.rmi.server.useCodebaseOnly=true -Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.port=9123 -Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.rmi.port=9123 -classpath /usr/apache-ant-1.9.2/lib/ant-launcher.jar -Dant.home=/usr/apache-ant-1.9.2 -Dant.library.dir=/usr/apache-ant-1.9.2/lib org.apache.tools.ant.launch.Launcher -cp  sleep 

Unfortunately, each time I see additional listening port:

tcp        0      0 :::41200                    :::*                        LISTEN      13597/java tcp        0      0 :::9123                     :::*                        LISTEN      13597/java 

Additional run:

tcp        0      0 :::58356                    :::*                        LISTEN      13629/java tcp        0      0 :::9123                     :::*                        LISTEN      13629/java 

Answer: It is Java's bug

I success to open bug on Java: http://bugs.java.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=8035404

like image 878
Michael Avatar asked Jan 02 '14 13:01

Michael


People also ask

What port does JMX use?

The default port for secure JMX access is 9875 and the default username and password are admin and springsource .

Is JMX a UDP or TCP port?

The JMX Messaging Protocol (JMXMP) connector is a configuration of the generic connector where the transport protocol is based on TCP and the object wrapping is native Java serialization.

Is JMX enabled by default?

Local JMX access If you are using a Java SE 6 or later JVM, local JMX management and monitoring are most likely enabled by default.


2 Answers

Contrary to common belief JMX/RMI doesn't need to open all these ports. You can actually force them to be same which will mean that at the end of the day you'll only need to punch one hole in the firewall (if firewall is your concern).

Try setting System Properties:

com.sun.management.jmxremote.port com.sun.management.jmxremote.rmi.port 

to the same value!!

Explicitly setting these will stop RMI from picking random ports. Setting them to the same value will make sure it opens less ports to listen on.

This will work in Java 7 update 25 or later.

What is the third port?

The third port that you see opened by your application (or the second if you followed my advice above) is used by the Java Attach API. It is what JConsole uses for connecting to "Local Process". The Java Attach API feature is enabled by default since Java 6 regardless of the com.sun.management.jmxremote property. This feature will use a random port (aka an OS ephemeral port) but it really doesn't matter because the feature only allows connections from the host itself. If you really dislike this feature then you can add -XX:+DisableAttachMechanism to the command line to disable the Java Attach API feature. Then you'll no longer see the java process (in this case Tomcat) listening on a random port.

How do I make JMX listen on the loopback interface only

With a custom made application you would use a RMIServerSocketFactory but this is Tomcat so you would have to do it using Tomcat's JMX Remote Lifecycle Listener.

On the other hand it doesn't matter now that you have the com.sun.management.jmxremote.local.only property since Java 7. It makes sure that only connections from the host itself are allowed. Mind you that JMX library doesn't achieve this by binding to loopback interface which would certainly be one way of doing it but also slight inaccurate as a host can potentially have several loopback interfaces.

In fact by and large (with the most recent additions to JDK wrt JMX) I would say that Tomcat's JMX Remote Lifecycle Listener is now redundant except if you want to bind to some really odd network interface.

like image 80
peterh Avatar answered Sep 23 '22 00:09

peterh


Using Oracle Java SE 1.8.0_121.

It's possible to set jmxremote.port and jmxremote.rmi.port to the same value, it's one less port opened. It's also possible to set jmxremote.host=127.0.0.1, to have that port (or those two ports, if you set them differently) bind to the loopback interface only.

Another port is still dynamically assigned though, and will bind to 0.0.0.0. I was not able to prevent this port with -XX+DisableAttachMechanism, and was also unable to make it bind to anything else than 0.0.0.0.

like image 30
user2679436 Avatar answered Sep 21 '22 00:09

user2679436