Can anyone explain why isn't the operator[] implemented for a std::list? I've searched around a bit but haven't found an answer. It wouldn't be too hard to implement or am I missing something?
What is use of operator = ? This operator is use to assign new elements to the list by replacing existing element in the list. And it modifies the size of new list according to contents. The another container from which we taking the new element has same data type of first container.
From a performance standpoint, the best reason to use std::list is so that when later on your app is suffering badly for performance and needs "an optimziation pass", you can replace it with another data structure and look like a hero.
Retrieving an element by index is an O(n) operation for linked list, which is what std::list
is. So it was decided that providing operator[]
would be deceptive, since people would be tempted to actively use it, and then you'd see code like:
std::list<int> xs;
for (int i = 0; i < xs.size(); ++i) {
int x = xs[i];
...
}
which is O(n^2) - very nasty. So ISO C++ standard specifically mentions that all STL sequences that support operator[]
should do it in amortized constant time (23.1.1[lib.sequence.reqmts]/12), which is achievable for vector
and deque
, but not list
.
For cases where you actually need that sort of thing, you can use std::advance
algorithm:
int iter = xs.begin();
std::advance(iter, i);
int x = *iter;
It would not be too hard (for the implementer) but it would be too hard at runtime, since the performance will be terrible in most cases. Forcing the user to go through each link will make it more obvious what is going on in there than 'myList[102452]' would.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With